RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Feb;54(2):164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.021. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
This is a nationally representative study of rural-urban disparities in the prevalence of probable dementia and cognitive impairment without dementia (CIND).
Data on non-institutionalized U.S. adults from the 2000 (n=16,386) and 2010 (n=16,311) cross-sections of the Health and Retirement Study were linked to respective Census assessments of the urban composition of residential census tracts. Relative risk ratios (RRR) for rural-urban differentials in dementia and CIND respective to normal cognitive status were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Analyses were conducted in 2016.
Unadjusted prevalence of dementia and CIND in rural and urban tracts converged so that rural disadvantages in the relative risk of dementia (RRR=1.42, 95% CI=1.10, 1.83) and CIND (RRR=1.35, 95% CI=1.13, 1.61) in 2000 no longer reached statistical significance in 2010. Adjustment for the strong protective role of educational attainment reduced rural disadvantages in 2000 to statistical nonsignificance, whereas adjustment for race/ethnicity resulted in a statistically significant increase in RRRs in 2010. Full adjustment for sociodemographic and health factors revealed persisting rural disadvantages for dementia and CIND in both periods with RRR in 2010 for dementia of 1.79 (95% CI=1.31, 2.43) and for CIND of 1.38 (95% CI=1.14, 1.68).
Larger gains in rural adults' cognitive functioning between 2000 and 2010 that are linked with increased educational attainment demonstrate long-term public health benefits of investment in secondary education. Persistent disadvantages in cognitive functioning among rural adults compared with sociodemographically similar urban peers highlight the importance of public health planning for more rapidly aging rural communities.
本研究旨在调查城乡间痴呆和非痴呆性认知障碍(CIND)患病率的差异。
本研究使用健康与退休研究 2000 年(n=16386)和 2010 年(n=16311)的横断面数据,并与各自的人口普查评估居住地段的城市组成情况进行了关联。采用多项逻辑回归评估痴呆和 CIND 相对于正常认知状态的城乡差异的相对风险比(RRR)。分析于 2016 年进行。
在未经调整的情况下,农村和城市地段的痴呆和 CIND 患病率趋于一致,因此,2000 年农村地区痴呆(RRR=1.42,95%CI=1.10,1.83)和 CIND(RRR=1.35,95%CI=1.13,1.61)的相对风险降低不再具有统计学意义。调整受教育程度的强烈保护作用后,2000 年农村地区的劣势降低到统计学上无意义,而调整种族/民族则导致 2010 年 RRR 具有统计学意义的增加。对社会人口和健康因素进行全面调整后,痴呆和 CIND 在两个时期均显示出农村地区的持续劣势,2010 年痴呆的 RRR 为 1.79(95%CI=1.31,2.43),CIND 的 RRR 为 1.38(95%CI=1.14,1.68)。
2000 年至 2010 年间,农村成年人认知功能的提高与受教育程度的提高有关,这表明对中等教育的投资带来了长期的公共卫生效益。与社会人口统计学相似的城市同龄人相比,农村成年人认知功能持续处于劣势,这突出了为老龄化较快的农村社区进行公共卫生规划的重要性。