Erdemir Ahmet, Hunter Peter J, Holzapfel Gerhard A, Loew Leslie M, Middleton John, Jacobs Christopher R, Nithiarasu Perumal, Löhner Rainlad, Wei Guowei, Winkelstein Beth A, Barocas Victor H, Guilak Farshid, Ku Joy P, Hicks Jennifer L, Delp Scott L, Sacks Michael, Weiss Jeffrey A, Ateshian Gerard A, Maas Steve A, McCulloch Andrew D, Peng Grace C Y
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biomodeling (CoBi) Core, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue (ND20), Cleveland, OH 44195 e-mail: .
Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Feb 1;140(2):0247011-02470111. doi: 10.1115/1.4038768.
The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.
计算建模在生物力学研究及相关临床护理中的作用将日益突出。生物力学领域一直在常规地开发计算模型,以探索各种生物结构的力学和力学生物学。因此,出现了大量的模型、数据和特定学科的模拟软件,以支持计算生物力学方面的工作。共享计算模型、相关数据和模拟软件最初是出于功利性的兴趣,而现在则成为了一种必要。模型的交换,作为学术出版所提供的知识交流的支持,具有重要意义。具体而言,模型共享有助于评估计算生物力学中的可重复性,并能提供重新利用和再利用的机会,以及医学培训的场所。该领域希望研究跨越多个系统、尺度和物理领域的生物和生物力学现象,这也促使人们共享建模资源,因为融合领域专家开发的模型将是全面模拟研究以及提高其严谨性和可重复性的必要步骤。本文的目的是了解生物力学领域对计算模型及相关资源共享的当前观点。我们征求了关于模型共享的机会、挑战和途径的意见,特别是作为学术出版工作流程的一部分。作为电气和电子工程师协会生物医学工程学会计算生物学和生理组技术委员会通过出版物解决模型可重复性这一更大努力的一部分,我们联系了一组期刊编辑和一些活跃于计算生物力学领域的研究人员,以收集简短的意见文章。对这些意见文章的综合表明,该领域认识到模型共享的必要性和有用性。有强烈的意愿促进模型共享,科学期刊也有相应的举措。在出版企业之外,存在促进生物力学模型共享的基础设施,模拟软件开发人员也有兴趣满足该领域对共享建模资源的需求。文中提到了鼓励使用标准化标记、对质量保证的担忧、认识到负担的增加以及资源管理的重要性。短期内,该领域最好在近期策略的基础上,尝试新的途径,以持续展示模型共享、推广模型共享及其效用。尽管如此,人们认识到需要一个长期战略来统一共享计算模型及相关资源的方法。一个由开放模型共享文化支持的可持续平台的发展,可能会通过持续且包容各方利益相关者的讨论来实现,例如通过可能成立一个联盟。