Dereli Büsra, Ortuño Manuel A, Cramer Christopher J
Department of Chemistry, Supercomputing Institute and Chemical Theory Center, University of Minnesota, 207 Pleasant St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455-0431, USA.
Chemphyschem. 2018 Apr 17;19(8):959-966. doi: 10.1002/cphc.201701334. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
Copper is ubiquitous and its one-electron redox chemistry is central to many catalytic processes. Modeling such chemistry requires electronic structure methods capable of the accurate prediction of ionization energies (IEs) for compounds including copper in different oxidation states and supported by various ligands. Herein, we estimate IEs for 12 mononuclear Cu species previously reported in the literature by using 21 modern density functionals and the DLPNO-CCSD(T) wave function theory model; we consider extrapolated values of the latter to provide reference values of acceptable accuracy. Our results reveal a considerable diversity in functional performance. Although there is nearly always at least one functional that performs well for any given species, there are none that do so for every member of the test set, and certain cases are particularly pathological. Over the entire test set, the SOGGA11-X functional performs best with a mean unsigned error (MUE) of 0.22 eV. PBE0, ωB97X-D, CAM-B3LYP, M11-L, B3LYP, and M11 exhibit MUEs ranging between 0.23 and 0.34 eV. When including relativistic effects with the zero-order regular approximation, ωB97X-D, CAM-B3LYP, and PBE0 are found to provide the best accuracy.
铜无处不在,其单电子氧化还原化学在许多催化过程中起着核心作用。对这种化学过程进行建模需要电子结构方法,能够准确预测不同氧化态且由各种配体支持的含铜化合物的电离能(IEs)。在此,我们使用21种现代密度泛函和DLPNO-CCSD(T)波函数理论模型估算了文献中先前报道的12种单核铜物种的电离能;我们考虑了后者的外推值以提供具有可接受精度的参考值。我们的结果揭示了泛函性能的显著差异。尽管对于任何给定的物种几乎总是至少有一种泛函表现良好,但对于测试集中的每个成员都没有一种泛函能做到这一点,并且某些情况特别糟糕。在整个测试集中,SOGGA11-X泛函表现最佳,平均绝对误差(MUE)为0.22 eV。PBE0、ωB97X-D、CAM-B3LYP、M11-L、B3LYP和M11的MUE在0.23至0.34 eV之间。当用零阶正则近似包含相对论效应时,发现ωB97X-D、CAM-B3LYP和PBE0提供了最佳精度。