Department of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Division of Surgery-Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jun;155(6):2277-2286.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.007. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
To assess in patients with aortopathy perioperative changes in thoracic aortic wall shear stress (WSS), which is known to affect arterial remodeling, and the effects of specific surgical interventions.
Presurgical and postsurgical aortic 4D flow MRI were performed in 33 patients with aortopathy (54 ± 14 years; 5 women; sinus of Valsalva (d_SOV)/midascending aortic (d_MAA) diameters = 44 ± 5/45 ± 6 mm) scheduled for aortic valve (AVR) and/or root (ARR) replacement. Control patients with aortopathy who did not have surgery were matched for age, sex, body size, and d_MAA (n = 20: 52 ± 14 years; 3 women; d_SOV/d_MAA = 42 ± 4/42 ± 4 mm). Regional aortic 3D systolic peak WSS was calculated. An atlas of WSS normal values was used to quantify the percentage of at-risk tissue area with abnormally high WSS, excluding the area to be resected/graft.
Peak WSS and at-risk area showed low interobserver variability (≤0.09 [-0.3; 0.5] Pa and 1.1% [-7%; 9%], respectively). In control patients, WSS was stable over time (follow-up-baseline differences ≤0.02 Pa and 0.0%, respectively). Proximal aortic WSS decreased after AVR (n = 5; peak WSS difference ≤-0.41 Pa and at-risk area ≤-10%, P < .05 vs controls). WSS was increased after ARR in regions distal to the graft (peak WSS difference ≥0.16 Pa and at-risk area ≥4%, P < .05 vs AVR). Follow-up duration had no significant effects on these WSS changes, except when comparing ascending aortic peak WSS between ARR and AVR (P = .006).
Serial perioperative 4D flow MRI investigations showed distinct patterns of postsurgical changes in aortic WSS, which included both reductions and translocations. Larger longitudinal studies are warranted to validate these findings with clinical outcomes and prediction of risk of future aortic events.
评估患有主动脉病变的患者围手术期胸主动脉壁切应力(WSS)的变化,已知 WSS 会影响动脉重塑,并评估特定手术干预的效果。
对 33 名患有主动脉病变(54±14 岁;5 名女性;窦部(d_SOV)/升主动脉中段(d_MAA)直径=44±5/45±6mm)的患者进行术前和术后主动脉 4D 流速 MRI 检查,这些患者计划接受主动脉瓣(AVR)和/或根部(ARR)置换。选择未接受手术的、具有相同主动脉病变但年龄、性别、体型和 d_MAA 相匹配的患者作为对照组(n=20:52±14 岁;3 名女性;d_SOV/d_MAA=42±4/42±4mm)。计算区域性主动脉 3D 收缩期峰值 WSS。使用 WSS 正常值图谱来量化异常高 WSS 的危险组织面积百分比,排除待切除/移植的区域。
峰值 WSS 和危险区域的观察者间变异性较低(≤0.09[-0.3;0.5]Pa 和 1.1%[-7%;9%])。在对照组患者中,WSS 随时间保持稳定(随访-基线差异≤0.02Pa 和 0.0%)。AVR 后近端主动脉 WSS 降低(n=5;峰值 WSS 差异≤-0.41Pa 和危险区域≤-10%,P<0.05 与对照组)。ARR 后,在移植物下游区域 WSS 增加(峰值 WSS 差异≥0.16Pa 和危险区域≥4%,P<0.05 与 AVR)。随访时间对这些 WSS 变化没有显著影响,除了比较 ARR 和 AVR 之间的升主动脉峰值 WSS 时(P=0.006)。
连续的围手术期 4D 流速 MRI 研究显示主动脉 WSS 术后变化存在明显模式,包括减少和转移。需要进行更大的纵向研究来验证这些发现与临床结果和未来主动脉事件风险预测的关系。