• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较普尔弗塔夫缝合法与阶梯状缝合法的生物力学研究。

Biomechanical study comparing Pulvertaft suture to step-cut suture.

作者信息

Duprat A, Gayet L-E, Breque C, Freslon M

机构信息

Service d'orthopédie traumatologie, CHU de Poitiers, rue de la Miletrie, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France.

Service d'orthopédie traumatologie, CHU de Poitiers, rue de la Miletrie, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers cedex, France.

出版信息

Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018 Feb;37(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.hansur.2017.11.004
PMID:29248396
Abstract

Tendon grafts are a component of the therapeutic arsenal for managing chronic flexor tendons injuries in the hand, especially during two-stage Hunter reconstruction. The purpose of this anatomical study was to compare the strength of the Pulvertaft weave versus the step-cut suture used for flexor tendon reconstruction to determine their role in early active mobilization. We performed a biomechanical study with cadaver specimens. Thirty-four hands were randomized and the tendons from both hands were equally assigned to each group. A comparison of the Pulvertaft weave (group 1) versus the step-cut suture (group 2) using the flexor digitorum profundus from the fourth finger and the longus palmaris was carried out. The main variable was the failure load in both repair groups. We also evaluated the cross-sectional area (CSA) and the tensile strength of the repairs. Thirty hands were included in our study. There was no significant difference in the failure load between the two groups (116N for group 1 versus 103N for group 2, P=0.2). The CSA was significantly smaller in the step-cut group compared to Pulvertaft group (19.8mm versus 35mm, P<0.01). The tensile strength was significantly higher in the step-cut group than in the Pulvertaft group (5.3N/mm versus 3.4N/mm, P<0.01). Early active mobilization requires a minimum repair strength of 75N. In our study, the step-cut suture appears strong enough and thin enough to decrease the fibrosis, which would lead to better functional results. No other study of this type has been published. The specimens in which the repair strength was less than 75N all involved a thin, weak longus palmaris. Other biomechanical studies should be done to define the anatomical criteria required for use of the palmaris longus tendon. The step-cut suture seems to be strong enough and thin enough to provide sufficient proximal attachment during flexor tendon reconstruction to allow early active mobilization.

摘要

肌腱移植是手部慢性屈肌腱损伤治疗手段的一部分,尤其是在两期亨特重建术中。这项解剖学研究的目的是比较用于屈肌腱重建的普尔弗塔夫编织法与阶梯状缝合的强度,以确定它们在早期主动活动中的作用。我们对尸体标本进行了生物力学研究。34只手被随机分组,每只手的肌腱被平均分配到每组。使用来自第四指的指深屈肌腱和掌长肌腱对普尔弗塔夫编织法(第1组)与阶梯状缝合(第2组)进行了比较。主要变量是两个修复组的破坏载荷。我们还评估了修复处的横截面积(CSA)和拉伸强度。我们的研究纳入了30只手。两组之间的破坏载荷没有显著差异(第1组为116N,第2组为103N,P = 0.2)。与普尔弗塔夫组相比,阶梯状缝合组的CSA显著更小(19.8mm对35mm,P < 0.01)。阶梯状缝合组的拉伸强度显著高于普尔弗塔夫组(5.3N/mm对3.4N/mm,P < 0.01)。早期主动活动需要最低75N的修复强度。在我们的研究中,阶梯状缝合似乎足够坚固且足够细,能够减少纤维化,从而带来更好的功能结果。尚未发表过此类其他研究。修复强度小于75N的标本均涉及纤细、脆弱的掌长肌腱。应该进行其他生物力学研究来确定使用掌长肌腱所需的解剖学标准。阶梯状缝合似乎足够坚固且足够细,能够在屈肌腱重建过程中提供足够的近端附着,以允许早期主动活动。

相似文献

1
Biomechanical study comparing Pulvertaft suture to step-cut suture.比较普尔弗塔夫缝合法与阶梯状缝合法的生物力学研究。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2018 Feb;37(1):24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
2
Biomechanical Study Comparing Pulvertaft, Double Side-to-Side, and Locking Side-to-Side Tendon Suture Techniques.生物力学研究比较粉碎性、双边对边和锁定双边对边肌腱缝合技术。
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Mar;46(3):246.e1-246.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.09.015. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Mechanical strength of the side-to-side versus Pulvertaft weave tendon repair.侧方对侧缝合与普尔弗塔夫编织肌腱修复的机械强度
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Apr;35(4):540-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Mar 11.
4
Comparison of step-cut and Pulvertaft attachment for flexor tendon graft: a biomechanics evaluation in an in vitro canine model.屈肌腱移植中阶梯状吻合与普尔弗塔夫吻合的比较:体外犬模型的生物力学评估
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2012 Nov;37(9):848-54. doi: 10.1177/1753193412442460. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
5
In Vitro Comparison between the Pulvertaft Weave and the Modified Core Suture Pulvertaft Weave.体外比较粉碎编织和改良核心缝线粉碎编织。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2021 Sep;26(3):377-382. doi: 10.1142/S2424835521500351.
6
Biomechanical comparison of lasso, Pulvertaft weave, and side-by-side tendon repairs.套索缝合法、普尔弗塔夫编织缝合法和并排肌腱修复术的生物力学比较
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):567-571. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181addb8f.
7
Biomechanical Analysis of Zone 2 Flexor Tendon Repair With a Coupler Device Versus Locking Cruciate Core Suture.使用耦合器装置与锁定十字形核心缝合对2区屈肌腱修复的生物力学分析
J Hand Surg Am. 2020 Sep;45(9):878.e1-878.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
Tensile strength of a new suture for fixation of tendon grafts when using a weave technique.使用编织技术时用于固定肌腱移植物的新型缝线的拉伸强度。
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(6):982-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.020.
9
Comparative Biomechanical Characteristics of Modified Side-to-Side Repair and Modified Pulvertaft Weaving Repair - In vitro Study.改良端端修复与改良普尔弗塔夫编织修复的比较生物力学特性——体外研究
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2019 Mar;24(1):76-82. doi: 10.1142/S2424835519500140.
10
Biomechanical assessment of a novel tendon junction.一种新型肌腱连接的生物力学评估
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013 Sep;38(7):795-800. doi: 10.1177/1753193412465233. Epub 2012 Nov 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Alternative Tendon Coaptations to the Pulvertaft Weave Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Biomechanical Studies.替代肌腱与 Pulvertaft 编织技术的吻合:生物力学研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hand (N Y). 2023 May;18(3):446-455. doi: 10.1177/15589447211043213. Epub 2021 Sep 16.