• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刑事法庭中的行为遗传学

Behavioral Genetics in Criminal Court.

作者信息

Scurich Nicholas, Appelbaum Paul S

机构信息

Department of Psychology & Social Behaviour, Department of Criminology, Law & Society, University of California, Irvine, 4213 Social and Behavioural Sciences Gateway, Irvine, CA, 92697-7085, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University College of Physicians & Surgeons, NY State Psychiatric Institute, 1051 Riverside Drive, Unit 122, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

出版信息

Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:772-774. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0212-4. Epub 2017 Sep 18.

DOI:10.1038/s41562-017-0212-4
PMID:29250604
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5730091/
Abstract

Introduction of behavioral genetic evidence of a predisposition to violent or impulsive behavior is on the rise in criminal trials. However, a panoply of data suggests that such evidence is ineffective at reducing judgments of culpability and punishment, and therefore its use in the legal process is likely to diminish.

摘要

在刑事审判中,引入行为遗传学证据证明暴力或冲动行为倾向的情况正在增加。然而,大量数据表明,此类证据在降低罪责判断和惩罚方面并无效果,因此其在法律程序中的使用可能会减少。

相似文献

1
Behavioral Genetics in Criminal Court.刑事法庭中的行为遗传学
Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:772-774. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0212-4. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
2
Effects of Behavioral Genetic Evidence on Perceptions of Criminal Responsibility and Appropriate Punishment.行为遗传学证据对刑事责任认知及适当惩罚的影响。
Psychol Public Policy Law. 2015 May;21(2):134-144. doi: 10.1037/law0000039.
3
Inherited proclivity: When should neurogenetics mitigate moral culpability for purposes of sentencing?
J Law Biosci. 2016 Feb 15;3(1):227-237. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsw005. eCollection 2016 Apr.
4
Criminal punishment and violent injury in Minnesota.明尼苏达州的刑事处罚与暴力伤害
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 15;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00303-3.
5
Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior.行为遗传学证据对犯罪行为裁决的影响。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2014;42(1):91-100.
6
Transfer of Juvenile Cases to Criminal Court.少年案件移送刑事法庭
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2016 Jan;25(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.08.011. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
7
The inclination to evil and the punishment of crime - from the bible to behavioral genetics.邪恶的倾向与犯罪的惩罚——从《圣经》到行为遗传学
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2014;51(3):162-8.
8
The guilty mind and criminal sentencing: integrating legal and empirical inquiry as illustrated by capital sentencing.犯罪心理与刑事量刑:以死刑量刑为例整合法律与实证研究
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(5):631-51. doi: 10.1002/bsl.551.
9
Admissibility and Relevance of Behavioral Genetic Evidence in a Criminal Trial.在刑事审判中,行为遗传学证据的可采性和相关性。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jul 1;72(7):853-855. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100226. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
10
Legal implications of genetics and crime research.遗传学与犯罪研究的法律影响。
Ciba Found Symp. 1996;194:248-56; discussion 256-64. doi: 10.1002/9780470514825.ch14.

引用本文的文献

1
GATTACA is still pertinent 25 years later.25年后,《千钧一发》仍然具有现实意义。
Nat Genet. 2022 Dec;54(12):1758-1760. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01242-5.
2
The effect of neuroscientific evidence on sentencing depends on how one conceives of reasons for incarceration.神经科学证据对量刑的影响取决于人们如何理解监禁的原因。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 2;17(11):e0276237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276237. eCollection 2022.
3
Genetic essentialist beliefs about criminality predict harshness of recommended punishment.遗传本质主义者对犯罪的信念预测了建议惩罚的严厉程度。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Dec;151(12):3230-3248. doi: 10.1037/xge0001240. Epub 2022 Jun 27.
4
Forensic Value of Genetic Variants Associated with Anti-Social Behavior.与反社会行为相关的基因变异的法医学价值
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 17;11(12):2386. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122386.
5
Asymmetrical genetic attributions for prosocial versus antisocial behaviour.亲社会行为与反社会行为的非对称遗传归因。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Sep;3(9):940-949. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0651-1. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

本文引用的文献

1
The Blunt-Edged Sword: Genetic Explanations of Misbehavior Neither Mitigate Nor Aggravate Punishment.双刃剑:不良行为的基因解释既不能减轻也不能加重惩罚。
J Law Biosci. 2016 Apr;3(1):140-157. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv053. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
2
Neurogenetic evidence in the courtroom: a randomised controlled trial with German judges.法庭上的神经遗传学证据:一项针对德国法官的随机对照试验。
J Med Genet. 2015 Nov;52(11):730-7. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103284. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
3
MAOA, childhood maltreatment, and antisocial behavior: meta-analysis of a gene-environment interaction.MAOA、儿童期虐待与反社会行为:基因-环境交互作用的荟萃分析。
Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 1;75(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.004. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
4
The double-edged sword: does biomechanism increase or decrease judges' sentencing of psychopaths?双刃剑:生物力学是否会增加或减少法官对精神变态者的量刑?
Science. 2012 Aug 17;337(6096):846-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1219569.
5
Genetics and criminal responsibility.遗传学与刑事责任。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Sep;15(9):378-80. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 19.