Center for Research on Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Psychiatric, Neurologic and Behavioral Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Philosophy Program, Bard College, Annandale-on Hudson, NY, USA.
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Sep;3(9):940-949. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0651-1. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Genetic explanations of human behaviour are increasingly common. While genetic attributions for behaviour are often considered relevant for assessing blameworthiness, it has not yet been established whether judgements about blameworthiness can themselves impact genetic attributions. Across six studies, participants read about individuals engaging in prosocial or antisocial behaviour, and rated the extent to which they believed that genetics played a role in causing the behaviour. Antisocial behaviour was consistently rated as less genetically influenced than prosocial behaviour. This was true regardless of whether genetic explanations were explicitly provided or refuted. Mediation analyses suggested that this asymmetry may stem from people's motivating desire to hold wrongdoers responsible for their actions. These findings suggest that those who seek to study or make use of genetic explanations' influence on evaluations of, for example, antisocial behaviour should consider whether such explanations are accepted in the first place, given the possibility of motivated causal reasoning.
遗传对人类行为的解释越来越常见。虽然对行为的遗传归因通常被认为与评估罪责有关,但尚未确定对罪责的判断本身是否会影响遗传归因。在六项研究中,参与者阅读了有关个人从事亲社会或反社会行为的信息,并对他们认为遗传在导致行为方面所起的作用进行了评分。反社会行为被一致认为遗传影响较小,而亲社会行为则相反。无论是否明确提供或反驳遗传解释,都是如此。中介分析表明,这种不对称可能源于人们希望让做错事的人对自己的行为负责的动机。这些发现表明,那些试图研究或利用遗传解释对例如反社会行为的评估的影响的人,应该考虑首先是否接受这种解释,因为存在动机因果推理的可能性。