Livestock and Dairy Development Department, Poultry Research Institute, Rawalpindi-46300, Pakistan.
Department of Poultry Production, Faculty of Animal Production and Technology, Ravi Campus, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore-54000, Pakistan.
Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):725-732. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex355.
The objective of this study was to explore the effects of free-range (FR), part-time free-range (PTFR), and cage system (CS) on behavioral repertoire in Lakha (LK), Mushki (MS), Peshawari (PW), and Sindhi (SN) varieties of Aseel chicken during the growing phase (9 to 18 wk of age). In total, 144 Aseel pullets were allotted to 12 treatment groups in a 3 × 4 (rearing system × Aseel variety) factorial arrangement, according to a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Each treatment group was replicated 3 times with 4 birds in each replicate (12 birds per treatment group). The pullets were randomly marked weekly for identification, and their behavior was observed through the focal animal sampling method. Time spent on different behavioral activities was recorded and converted to a percentage. The data were analyzed using 2-way ANOVA under a factorial arrangement using SAS 9.1, and the behavioral parameters were evaluated. The results indicated greater (P < 0.05) sitting, standing, drinking, preening, and aggressiveness in CS; walking, running, and jumping in PTFR; and foraging and dustbathing in both FR and PTFR, whereas feather pecking was found to be reduced in FR compared with PTFR and CS. Among varieties, PW showed the least feeding/foraging and feather pecking behavior, and greater standing, running, and jumping behavior (P < 0.05). However, SN spent less time in walking and preening, and more time in sitting, drinking, and aggressiveness. Dustbathing was found to be similar in all Aseel varieties (P = 0.135). In conclusion, the PTFR system could be suggested as a substitute for conventional housing systems because it better accommodates normal behavior in Aseel pullets.
本研究旨在探讨自由放养(FR)、部分时间自由放养(PTFR)和笼养系统(CS)对 Lakha(LK)、Mushki(MS)、Peshawari(PW)和 Sindhi(SN)品种 Aseel 鸡生长阶段(9 至 18 周龄)行为表现的影响。共有 144 只 Aseel 母鸡按 3×4(饲养系统×Aseel 品种)析因设计,随机分为 12 个处理组,每个处理组 3 次重复,每个重复 4 只鸡(每个处理组 12 只鸡)。每周对雏鸡进行随机标记以进行识别,并通过焦点动物采样法观察其行为。记录不同行为活动的时间,并转换为百分比。使用 SAS 9.1 下的析因设计进行 2 因素方差分析,评估行为参数。结果表明,CS 组母鸡表现出更多的(P<0.05)坐、站、饮水、理羽和攻击行为;PTFR 组母鸡表现出更多的走、跑和跳行为;FR 和 PTFR 组母鸡表现出更多的觅食和沙浴行为,而 FR 组母鸡啄羽行为比 PTFR 和 CS 组减少。在品种方面,PW 品种母鸡表现出最少的采食/觅食和啄羽行为,以及更多的站立、跑和跳行为(P<0.05)。然而,SN 品种母鸡在行走和理羽方面花费的时间较少,在坐、饮水和攻击方面花费的时间较多。所有 Aseel 品种母鸡的沙浴行为相似(P=0.135)。总之,PTFR 系统可以作为传统饲养系统的替代品,因为它更能适应 Aseel 母鸡的正常行为。