Suppr超能文献

在高收入、中等收入和低收入国家,降压药物的可及性和可负担性及其对血压控制的影响:对 PURE 研究数据的分析。

Availability and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines and the effect on blood pressure control in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: an analysis of the PURE study data.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep;2(9):e411-e419. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30141-X. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is considered the most important risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but its control is poor worldwide. We aimed to assess the availability and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines, and the association with use of these medicines and blood pressure control in countries at varying levels of economic development.

METHODS

We analysed the availability, costs, and affordability of blood pressure-lowering medicines with data recorded from 626 communities in 20 countries participating in the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiological (PURE) study. Medicines were considered available if they were present in the local pharmacy when surveyed, and affordable if their combined cost was less than 20% of the households' capacity to pay. We related information about availability and affordability to use of these medicines and blood pressure control with multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression models, and compared results for high-income, upper-middle-income, lower-middle-income, and low-income countries. Data for India are presented separately because it has a large generic pharmaceutical industry and a higher availability of medicines than other countries at the same economic level.

FINDINGS

The availability of two or more classes of blood pressure-lowering drugs was lower in low-income and middle-income countries (except for India) than in high-income countries. The proportion of communities with four drug classes available was 94% in high-income countries (108 of 115 communities), 76% in India (68 of 90), 71% in upper-middle-income countries (90 of 126), 47% in lower-middle-income countries (107 of 227), and 13% in low-income countries (nine of 68). The proportion of households unable to afford two blood pressure-lowering medicines was 31% in low-income countries (1069 of 3479 households), 9% in middle-income countries (5602 of 65 471), and less than 1% in high-income countries (44 of 10 880). Participants with known hypertension in communities that had all four drug classes available were more likely to use at least one blood pressure-lowering medicine (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2·23, 95% CI 1·59-3·12); p<0·0001), combination therapy (1·53, 1·13-2·07; p=0·054), and have their blood pressure controlled (2·06, 1·69-2·50; p<0·0001) than were those in communities where blood pressure-lowering medicines were not available. Participants with known hypertension from households able to afford four blood pressure-lowering drug classes were more likely to use at least one blood pressure-lowering medicine (adjusted OR 1·42, 95% CI 1·25-1·62; p<0·0001), combination therapy (1·26, 1·08-1·47; p=0·0038), and have their blood pressure controlled (1·13, 1·00-1·28; p=0·0562) than were those unable to afford the medicines.

INTERPRETATION

A large proportion of communities in low-income and middle-income countries do not have access to more than one blood pressure-lowering medicine and, when available, they are often not affordable. These factors are associated with poor blood pressure control. Ensuring access to affordable blood pressure-lowering medicines is essential for control of hypertension in low-income and middle-income countries.

FUNDING

Population Health Research Institute, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario, Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient Oriented Research through the Ontario SPOR Support Unit, the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, pharmaceutical companies (with major contributions from AstraZeneca [Canada], Sanofi Aventis [France and Canada], Boehringer Ingelheim [Germany amd Canada], Servier, and GlaxoSmithKline), Novartis and King Pharma, and national or local organisations in participating countries.

摘要

背景

高血压被认为是心血管疾病最重要的危险因素,但全球范围内的高血压控制情况不佳。我们旨在评估在不同经济发展水平的国家中,降压药物的可及性和可负担性,以及这些药物的使用与血压控制之间的关系。

方法

我们使用来自参与前瞻性城市农村流行病学(PURE)研究的 20 个国家的 626 个社区的数据,分析了降压药物的可及性、成本和可负担性。如果这些药物在当地药房有售,则认为它们是可及的;如果这些药物的总费用低于家庭支付能力的 20%,则认为它们是可负担的。我们使用多水平混合效应逻辑回归模型,将这些药物的可及性和可负担性与使用情况以及血压控制情况相关联,并比较了高收入、中上收入、中下收入和低收入国家的结果。由于印度拥有庞大的仿制药产业,而且其药物可及性高于同经济水平的其他国家,因此我们单独呈现了印度的数据。

发现

在低收入和中等收入国家(印度除外),两种或两种以上降压药物的可及性低于高收入国家。在高收入国家(115 个社区中的 108 个)、印度(90 个社区中的 68 个)、中上收入国家(126 个社区中的 90 个)、中下收入国家(227 个社区中的 107 个)和低收入国家(68 个社区中的 9 个)中,有四种降压药物的社区比例分别为 94%、76%、71%、47%和 13%。无法负担两种降压药物的家庭比例分别为 31%(3479 户家庭中的 1069 户)、9%(65471 户家庭中的 5602 户)和低于 1%(10880 户家庭中的 44 户)在有所有四种药物的社区中,已知患有高血压的参与者更有可能使用至少一种降压药物(调整后的优势比[OR] 2.23,95%CI 1.59-3.12;p<0.0001)、联合治疗(1.53,1.13-2.07;p=0.054)和血压得到控制(2.06,1.69-2.50;p<0.0001),而在没有降压药物的社区中,血压得到控制的可能性较小。在有能力负担四种降压药物的家庭中,已知患有高血压的参与者更有可能使用至少一种降压药物(调整后的 OR 1.42,95%CI 1.25-1.62;p<0.0001)、联合治疗(1.26,1.08-1.47;p=0.0038)和血压得到控制(1.13,1.00-1.28;p=0.0562),而在无法负担药物的参与者中,血压得到控制的可能性较小。

解释

在低收入和中等收入国家的许多社区中,只有一种以上的降压药物是无法获得的,而且即使有,也往往是无法负担的。这些因素与血压控制不良有关。确保获得负担得起的降压药物对于控制低收入和中等收入国家的高血压至关重要。

资金

人口健康研究所、加拿大卫生研究院、安大略省心脏和中风基金会、加拿大卫生研究院通过安大略省 SPOR 支持单位的患者导向研究战略、安大略省卫生部和长期护理部、制药公司(阿斯利康[加拿大]、赛诺菲安万特[法国和加拿大]、勃林格殷格翰[德国和加拿大]、施维雅、葛兰素史克)、诺华和 King Pharma,以及参与国家或当地组织。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验