Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Spinal Surgery and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden; Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Spine J. 2018 Aug;18(8):1347-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.12.009. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
Surgery because of disc herniation or spinal stenosis results mostly in large improvement in the short-term, but mild to moderate improvements for pain and disability at long-term follow-up. Prehabilitation has been defined as augmenting functional capacity before surgery, which may have beneficial effect on outcome after surgery.
The aim was to study if presurgery physiotherapy improves function, pain, and health in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorder scheduled for surgery.
A single-blinded, two-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT).
A total of 197 patients were consecutively included at a spine clinic. The inclusion criteria were patients scheduled for surgery because of disc herniation, spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease (DDD), 25-80 years of age.
Primary outcome was Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes were pain intensity, anxiety, depression, self-efficacy, fear avoidance, physical activity, and treatment effect.
Patients were randomized to either presurgery physiotherapy or standardized information, with follow-up after the presurgery intervention as well as 3 and 12 months post surgery. The study was funded by regional research funds for US$77,342. No conflict of interest is declared.
The presurgery physiotherapy group had better ODI, visual analog scale (VAS) back pain, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), EQ-VAS, Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire-Physical Activity (FABQ-PA), Self-Efficacy Scale (SES), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression scores and activity level compared with the waiting-list group after the presurgery intervention. The improvements were small, but larger than the study-specific minimal clinical important change (MCIC) in VAS back and leg pain, EQ-5D, and FABQ-PA, and almost in line with MCIC in ODI and Physical Component Summary (PCS) in the physiotherapy group. Post surgery, the only difference between the groups was higher activity level in the physiotherapy group compared with the waiting-list group.
Presurgery physiotherapy decreases pain, risk of avoidance behavior, and worsening of psychological well-being, and improves quality of life and physical activity levels before surgery compared with waiting-list controls. These results were maintained only for activity levelspost surgery. Still, presurgery selection, content, dosage of exercises, and importance of being active in a presurgery physiotherapy intervention is of interest to study further to improve long-term outcome.
手术治疗椎间盘突出症或椎管狭窄症可在短期内显著改善,但在长期随访中疼痛和残疾的改善程度较轻且中度。术前康复被定义为在手术前增强功能能力,这可能对手术后的结果有有益的影响。
研究术前物理治疗是否可改善计划接受手术治疗的退行性腰椎疾病患者的功能、疼痛和健康状况。
一项单盲、双臂、随机对照试验(RCT)。
共连续纳入脊柱诊所的 197 名患者。纳入标准为因椎间盘突出症、椎管狭窄症、脊椎滑脱或退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)而计划接受手术的患者,年龄 25-80 岁。
Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)。次要结局包括疼痛强度、焦虑、抑郁、自我效能、恐惧回避、身体活动和治疗效果。
患者被随机分配至术前物理治疗组或标准化信息组,在术前干预后以及术后 3 个月和 12 个月进行随访。该研究由区域研究基金资助,金额为 77342 美元。无利益冲突声明。
与等待名单组相比,术前物理治疗组在术前干预后 ODI、视觉模拟量表(VAS)腰痛、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)、EQ 视觉模拟量表(EQ-VAS)、恐惧回避信念问卷-体力活动(FABQ-PA)、自我效能量表(SES)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)抑郁评分以及活动水平更高。这些改善虽小,但大于研究特定的 VAS 腰痛和腿痛、EQ-5D 和 FABQ-PA 的最小临床重要变化(MCIC),且接近物理治疗组 ODI 和物理成分综合评分(PCS)的 MCIC。手术后,两组之间的唯一差异是物理治疗组的活动水平高于等待名单组。
与等待名单对照组相比,术前物理治疗可降低疼痛、回避行为风险以及心理幸福感恶化,并改善手术前的生活质量和身体活动水平。这些结果仅在手术后的活动水平上得以维持。尽管如此,术前选择、练习的内容、剂量以及在术前物理治疗干预中积极活动的重要性仍值得进一步研究,以改善长期结果。