• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于小儿患者磁共振成像(MRI)扫描时镇静效果的比较:当前研究的荟萃分析

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol on the sedation of pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning: a meta-analysis of current studies.

作者信息

Zhou Qiang, Shen Lingli, Zhang Xinxian, Li Jiong, Tang Yong

机构信息

Department of Radiology, XuZhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China.

Department of Neurology, The Tenth Ward, XuZhou Children's Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221006, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 1;8(60):102468-102473. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22271. eCollection 2017 Nov 24.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.22271
PMID:29254262
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5731972/
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a widely applied diagnostic approach for detection of pediatric diseases. Sedatives are commonly used to acquire the accurate MRI images. Dexmedetomidine and propofol serve as sole or combined sedatives in pediatric MRI scanning. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children ubdergoing MRI. Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched up to June, 2017. Onset of sedation time, recovery time, sedation time, MRI time, MRI quality and emergence delirium were analyzed. 6 studies with 368 subjects were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooling data showed that propofol had a shorter onset of sedation time (WMD: 6.05, 95% CI: 3.12 - 8.98, < 0.0001) and recovery time (WMD: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.36-1.67, < 0.001) than dexmedetomidine. But for sedation time and MRI scanning time, there were no differences between the two groups (sedation time: = 0.29; MRI scanning time: = 0.50). There were no significance between dexmedetomidine and propofol on MRI quality (MRI quality 1: = 1.00; MRI quality 2: = 0.68; MRI quality 3: = 0.45). Two studies using Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) to assess emergence delirium 10 minutes after awakening showed that propofol had a lower PAED than dexmedetomidine (WMD: 2.57, 95% CI: 0.15-5.00, = 0.04). Thus, propofol should be encouraged in pediatric patients undergoing MRI for its better sedative effects and a low incidence of emergence delirium.

摘要

磁共振成像(MRI)是一种广泛应用于儿科疾病检测的诊断方法。镇静剂常用于获取准确的MRI图像。右美托咪定和丙泊酚在儿科MRI扫描中分别或联合用作镇静剂。这项荟萃分析旨在比较右美托咪定和丙泊酚在接受MRI检查的儿童中的疗效。检索了截至2017年6月的PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和科学网。分析了镇静起效时间、恢复时间、镇静时间、MRI检查时间、MRI图像质量和苏醒期谵妄情况。本荟萃分析纳入了6项研究,共368名受试者。汇总数据显示,丙泊酚的镇静起效时间(加权均数差:6.05,95%可信区间:3.12 - 8.98,P<0.0001)和恢复时间(加权均数差:1.01,95%可信区间:0.36 - 1.67,P<0.001)比右美托咪定短。但在镇静时间和MRI扫描时间方面,两组之间没有差异(镇静时间:P = 0.29;MRI扫描时间:P = 0.50)。右美托咪定和丙泊酚在MRI图像质量方面没有显著差异(MRI图像质量1:P = 1.00;MRI图像质量2:P = 0.68;MRI图像质量3:P = 0.45)。两项使用小儿麻醉苏醒期谵妄(PAED)量表评估苏醒10分钟后谵妄情况的研究表明,丙泊酚的PAED评分低于右美托咪定(加权均数差:2.57,95%可信区间:0.15 - 5.00,P = 0.04)。因此,对于接受MRI检查的儿科患者,应鼓励使用丙泊酚,因为其镇静效果更好,苏醒期谵妄发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/86606f5465ad/oncotarget-08-102468-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/71fb61e6c608/oncotarget-08-102468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/2f23ab8ae0b5/oncotarget-08-102468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/e3bcd9270c33/oncotarget-08-102468-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/86606f5465ad/oncotarget-08-102468-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/71fb61e6c608/oncotarget-08-102468-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/2f23ab8ae0b5/oncotarget-08-102468-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/e3bcd9270c33/oncotarget-08-102468-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e57/5731972/86606f5465ad/oncotarget-08-102468-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dexmedetomidine versus propofol on the sedation of pediatric patients during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning: a meta-analysis of current studies.右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于小儿患者磁共振成像(MRI)扫描时镇静效果的比较:当前研究的荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 1;8(60):102468-102473. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22271. eCollection 2017 Nov 24.
2
Comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol as sedatives for pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚作为接受磁共振成像的儿科患者镇静剂的比较:一项采用序贯试验分析的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):1775-1785. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7751. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
3
Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于儿童磁共振成像的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):11881-9. eCollection 2015.
4
Effects of dexmedetomidine sedation for magnetic resonance imaging in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.右美托咪定镇静用于儿童磁共振成像的效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Anesth. 2021 Aug;35(4):525-535. doi: 10.1007/s00540-021-02946-4. Epub 2021 May 18.
5
Open-label, prospective, randomized comparison of propofol and sevoflurane for laryngeal mask anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.丙泊酚与七氟醚用于小儿磁共振成像喉罩麻醉的开放标签、前瞻性、随机对照研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Jan;30(1):175-81. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.008.
6
Comparison of propofol and dexmedetomedine techniques in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.丙泊酚与右美托咪定用于儿童磁共振成像的技术比较
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):813-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12408. Epub 2014 May 12.
7
A retrospective comparison of propofol alone to propofol in combination with dexmedetomidine for pediatric 3T MRI sedation.丙泊酚单独使用与丙泊酚联合右美托咪定用于小儿3T磁共振成像镇静的回顾性比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jan;27(1):52-59. doi: 10.1111/pan.13041. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
8
Effect of esketamine vs dexmedetomidine adjunct to propofol sedation for pediatric 3Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.依托咪酯镇静辅助氯胺酮与右美托咪定用于儿科 3Tesla 磁共振成像的效果:一项随机、双盲、对照试验。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Nov 21;27(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00890-x.
9
Dexmedetomidine vs propofol sedation reduces delirium in patients after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials.右美托咪定与丙泊酚镇静对心脏手术后患者谵妄的影响:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析及试验序贯分析
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
The frequency of emergence delirium in children undergoing outpatient anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging.行磁共振成像检查的门诊麻醉患儿出现谵妄的频率。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14763. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14763. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergence delirium in children: a Brazilian survey.儿童谵妄的出现:巴西调查。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Mar-Apr;72(2):207-212. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.12.029. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
2
Drug selection for sedation and general anesthesia in children undergoing ambulatory magnetic resonance imaging.门诊磁共振成像儿童镇静及全身麻醉的药物选择
Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2020 Jul;37(3):159-168. doi: 10.12701/yujm.2020.00171. Epub 2020 Apr 17.
3
Evaluation of the safety of using propofol for paediatric procedural sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Dexmedetomidine for Sedation During Noninvasive Ventilation in Pediatric Patients.右美托咪定用于小儿患者无创通气期间的镇静
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;18(9):831-837. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001226.
2
Evaluation of efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol for sedation in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于儿童磁共振成像镇静的疗效评估。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 Apr-Jun;11(2):163-168. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.203014.
3
Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine.右美托咪定的临床药代动力学与药效学
评估丙泊酚用于儿科操作镇静的安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 22;9(1):12245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48724-x.
4
Comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol as sedatives for pediatric patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚作为接受磁共振成像的儿科患者镇静剂的比较:一项采用序贯试验分析的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Exp Ther Med. 2019 Sep;18(3):1775-1785. doi: 10.3892/etm.2019.7751. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017 Aug;56(8):893-913. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7.
4
Practice guidelines for propofol sedation by non-anesthesiologists: the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force recommendations on propofol sedation.非麻醉医生使用丙泊酚镇静的实践指南:韩国麻醉医师协会特别工作组关于丙泊酚镇静的建议
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2016 Dec;69(6):545-554. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2016.69.6.545. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
Does dexmedetomidine cause less airway collapse than propofol when used for deep sedation?右美托咪定用于深度镇静时引起的气道塌陷是否比丙泊酚少?
J Clin Anesth. 2016 Dec;35:259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.07.035. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
6
Emergence Delirium in Pediatric Anesthesia.小儿麻醉中的苏醒期谵妄
Paediatr Drugs. 2017 Feb;19(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s40272-016-0201-5.
7
Clinical efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于儿童磁共振成像的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Aug 15;8(8):11881-9. eCollection 2015.
8
Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation.丙泊酚:关于其在儿科麻醉和镇静中作用的综述
CNS Drugs. 2015 Jul;29(7):543-63. doi: 10.1007/s40263-015-0259-6.
9
A comparison of single-dose dexmedetomidine or propofol on the incidence of emergence delirium in children undergoing general anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging.比较单次剂量右美托咪定或丙泊酚对行全身麻醉磁共振成像的儿童苏醒期谵妄发生率的影响。
Anaesthesia. 2015 Apr;70(4):393-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.12867. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
Comparison of propofol and dexmedetomedine techniques in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.丙泊酚与右美托咪定用于儿童磁共振成像的技术比较
Paediatr Anaesth. 2014 Aug;24(8):813-8. doi: 10.1111/pan.12408. Epub 2014 May 12.