Taghavi Seyed Alireza, Niknam Ramin, Alavi Seyed Ehsan, Ejtehadi Fardad, Sivandzadeh Gholam Reza, Eshraghian Ahad
Gastroenterohepatology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2017 Oct;9(4):201-205. doi: 10.15171/mejdd.2017.74.
BACKGROUND Anatomical variations in the biliary system have been proven to be of clinical importance. Awareness of the pattern of these variations in a specific population may help to prevent and manage biliary injuries during surgical and endoscopic procedures. Knowledge of the biliary anatomy will be also of great help in planning the drainage of adequate percentage of liver parenchyma in endoscopic or radiological procedures. METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) from April 2013 to April 2015 at Nemazee Hospital, a referral center in the south of Iran, were included in this cross-sectional study. The patients with previous hepatic or biliary surgery, liver injury or destructive biliary disease were excluded from the study. All ERCPs were reviewed by two expert gastroenterologists in this field. The disagreed images by the two gastroenterologists were excluded. Huang classification was used for categorizing the different structural variants of the biliary tree, and the frequency of each variant was recorded. RESULTS Totally, 362 patients (181 men and 181 women) were included in the study. 163 patients (45%) had type A1 Huang classification (right dominant), which was the most prevalent type among our patients. 55% of them had non-right dominant anatomy. The result of the Chi-square test revealed that there was no statistically significant difference between the men and women regarding the anatomical variations (p = 0.413). CONCLUSION The anatomical variation in the biliary system among Iranian patients is comparable to other regions of the world. Significant proportions of our patients are non-right dominant and may need bilateral biliary drainage.
背景 胆道系统的解剖变异已被证明具有临床重要性。了解特定人群中这些变异的模式可能有助于预防和处理手术及内镜操作过程中的胆道损伤。胆道解剖知识对于在内镜或放射学操作中规划足够比例的肝实质引流也将有很大帮助。
方法 本横断面研究纳入了2013年4月至2015年4月在伊朗南部的转诊中心内马齐医院接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)的所有连续患者。既往有肝脏或胆道手术史、肝损伤或破坏性胆道疾病的患者被排除在研究之外。所有ERCP检查均由该领域的两名专家胃肠病学家进行审查。两名胃肠病学家意见不一致的图像被排除。采用黄氏分类法对胆道树的不同结构变异进行分类,并记录每种变异的频率。
结果 本研究共纳入362例患者(181例男性和181例女性)。163例患者(45%)为黄氏A1型分类(右侧优势型),这是我们患者中最常见的类型。其中55%的患者为非右侧优势型解剖结构。卡方检验结果显示,男性和女性在解剖变异方面无统计学显著差异(p = 0.413)。
结论 伊朗患者胆道系统的解剖变异与世界其他地区相当。我们相当比例的患者为非右侧优势型,可能需要双侧胆道引流。