Houston Derek D, Azeem Shahan, Lundy Coady W, Sato Yuko, Guo Baoqing, Blanchong Julie A, Gauger Phillip C, Marks David R, Yoon Kyoung-Jin, Adelman James S
Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States of America.
Department of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, CO, United States of America.
PeerJ. 2017 Dec 13;5:e4060. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4060. eCollection 2017.
Avian influenza virus (AIV) infections occur naturally in wild bird populations and can cross the wildlife-domestic animal interface, often with devastating impacts on commercial poultry. Migratory waterfowl and shorebirds are natural AIV reservoirs and can carry the virus along migratory pathways, often without exhibiting clinical signs. However, these species rarely inhabit poultry farms, so transmission into domestic birds likely occurs through other means. In many cases, human activities are thought to spread the virus into domestic populations. Consequently, biosecurity measures have been implemented to limit human-facilitated outbreaks. The 2015 avian influenza outbreak in the United States, which occurred among poultry operations with strict biosecurity controls, suggests that alternative routes of virus infiltration may exist, including bridge hosts: wild animals that transfer virus from areas of high waterfowl and shorebird densities.
Here, we examined small, wild birds (songbirds, woodpeckers, etc.) and mammals in Iowa, one of the regions hit hardest by the 2015 avian influenza epizootic, to determine whether these animals carry AIV. To assess whether influenza A virus was present in other species in Iowa during our sampling period, we also present results from surveillance of waterfowl by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources and Unites Stated Department of Agriculture.
Capturing animals at wetlands and near poultry facilities, we swabbed 449 individuals, internally and externally, for the presence of influenza A virus and no samples tested positive by qPCR. Similarly, serology from 402 animals showed no antibodies against influenza A. Although several species were captured at both wetland and poultry sites, the overall community structure of wild species differed significantly between these types of sites. In contrast, 83 out of 527 sampled waterfowl tested positive for influenza A via qPCR.
These results suggest that even though influenza A viruses were present on the Iowa landscape at the time of our sampling, small, wild birds and rodents were unlikely to be frequent bridge hosts.
禽流感病毒(AIV)感染在野生鸟类种群中自然发生,并且能够跨越野生动物与家畜的界限,常常对商业家禽造成毁灭性影响。迁徙水鸟和滨鸟是AIV的天然宿主,它们能够沿着迁徙路线携带病毒,且通常不表现出临床症状。然而,这些物种很少栖息在家禽养殖场,因此病毒传播到家禽中可能通过其他途径。在许多情况下,人们认为是人类活动将病毒传播到家禽群体中。因此,已实施生物安全措施以限制人为促成的疫情爆发。2015年美国发生的禽流感疫情,发生在实施了严格生物安全控制措施的家禽养殖场,这表明可能存在病毒渗透的其他途径,包括桥梁宿主:将病毒从水鸟和滨鸟密度高的地区传播出去的野生动物。
在此,我们对爱荷华州的小型野生鸟类(鸣禽、啄木鸟等)和哺乳动物进行了检测,爱荷华州是2015年禽流感 epizootic疫情受灾最严重的地区之一,以确定这些动物是否携带AIV。为了评估在我们采样期间爱荷华州其他物种中是否存在甲型流感病毒,我们还展示了爱荷华州自然资源部和美国农业部对水鸟监测的结果。
我们在湿地和家禽养殖场附近捕获动物,对449只个体的体内和体外进行拭子采样以检测甲型流感病毒,通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测没有样本呈阳性。同样,402只动物的血清学检测未显示出针对甲型流感的抗体。尽管在湿地和家禽养殖场都捕获了几个物种,但这些类型的地点之间野生物种的总体群落结构存在显著差异。相比之下,527只采样水鸟中有83只通过qPCR检测出甲型流感呈阳性。
这些结果表明,尽管在我们采样时爱荷华州的环境中存在甲型流感病毒,但小型野生鸟类和啮齿动物不太可能是常见的桥梁宿主。