Overton Kristen, Varma Rick, Post Jeffrey J
Infectious Diseases Department, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2018 Jan;81(1):59-72. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0072. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
It remains uncertain if interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs) are superior to the tuberculin skin test (TST) for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis (TB) or latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in immunosuppressed populations including people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the performance of IGRAs and the TST in people with HIV with active TB or LTBI in low and high prevalence TB countries.
We searched the MEDLINE database from 1966 through to January 2017 for studies that compared results of the TST with either the commercial QuantiFERON-TB Gold in Tube (QFTGT) assay or previous assay versions, the T-SPOT.TB assay or in-house IGRAs. Data were summarized by TB prevalence. Tests for concordance and differences in proportions were undertaken as appropriate. The variation in study methodology was appraised.
Thirty-two studies including 4,856 HIV subjects met the search criteria. Fourteen studies compared the tests in subjects with LTBI in low TB prevalence settings. The QFTGT had a similar rate of reactivity to the TST, although the first-generation version of that assay was reactive more commonly. IGRAs were more frequently positive than the TST in HIV infected subjects with active TB. There was considerable study methodology and population heterogeneity, and generally low concordance between tests. Both the TST and IGRAs were affected by CD4 T-cell immunodeficiency.
Our review of comparative data does not provide robust evidence to support the assertion that the IGRAs are superior to the TST when used in HIV infected subjects to diagnose either active TB or LTBI.
对于包括人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者在内的免疫抑制人群,γ-干扰素释放试验(IGRAs)在诊断活动性结核病(TB)或潜伏性结核感染(LTBI)方面是否优于结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)仍不确定。本研究的目的是系统评价IGRAs和TST在结核病高流行和低流行国家的HIV感染者中诊断活动性TB或LTBI的性能。
我们检索了1966年至2017年1月的MEDLINE数据库,以查找比较TST结果与商业全血γ-干扰素释放试验(QFTGT)或其先前版本、T-SPOT.TB试验或内部IGRAs结果的研究。数据按结核病患病率进行汇总。酌情进行一致性检验和比例差异检验。对研究方法的差异进行评估。
32项研究共纳入4856名HIV感染者,符合检索标准。14项研究在结核病低流行地区的LTBI患者中比较了这两种检测方法。QFTGT与TST的反应率相似,尽管该试验的第一代版本反应更常见。在活动性TB的HIV感染者中,IGRAs比TST更常呈阳性。研究方法和人群存在相当大的异质性,检测之间的一致性普遍较低。TST和IGRAs均受CD4 T细胞免疫缺陷的影响。
我们对比较数据的综述没有提供有力证据支持以下观点:在HIV感染者中用于诊断活动性TB或LTBI时,IGRAs优于TST。