Suppr超能文献

斑胸草雀安乐死最佳实践的评估()。

Evaluation of Best Practices for the Euthanasia of Zebra Finches ().

作者信息

Scott Kathleen E, Bracchi Lauren A, Lieberman Mia T, Hill Nichola J, Caron Tyler J, Patterson Mary M

机构信息

Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

出版信息

J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2017 Nov 1;56(6):802-806.

Abstract

Although zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) have been used in biomedical research for many years, no published reports are available about euthanizing these small birds. In this study, we compared 5 methods for zebra finch euthanasia: sodium pentobarbital (NaP) given intracoelomically with physical restraint but no anesthesia; isoflurane anesthesia followed by intracoelomic injection of NaP; and CO2 asphyxiation at 20%, 40%, and 80% chamber displacement rates (percentage of chamber volume per minute). Birds undergoing euthanasia were videorecorded and scored by 2 observers for behaviors potentially related to discomfort or distress. Time to recumbency and time until respiratory arrest (RA) were also assessed. RA was achieved faster by using NaP in a conscious bird compared to using isoflurane anesthesia followed by NaP; however, neither method caused behaviors that might affect animal welfare, such as open-mouth breathing, to any appreciable extent. Among the CO2 treatment groups, there was an inverse correlation between the chamber displacement rate used and the duration of open-mouth breathing, onset of head retroflexion, and time to RA. The results demonstrate that the intracoelomic administration of NaP in an awake, restrained zebra finch is a rapid and effective method of euthanasia. If CO2 is used to euthanize these birds, a high displacement rate (for example, 80%) will minimize the duration of the procedure and associated behaviors.

摘要

尽管斑胸草雀(Taeniopygia guttata)已在生物医学研究中使用多年,但目前尚无关于对这些小鸟实施安乐死的公开报道。在本研究中,我们比较了5种斑胸草雀安乐死方法:腹腔内注射戊巴比妥钠(NaP),同时进行身体约束但不使用麻醉剂;异氟烷麻醉后腹腔内注射NaP;以及在20%、40%和80%的舱室置换率(每分钟舱室体积的百分比)下进行二氧化碳窒息法。对接受安乐死的鸟类进行录像,并由2名观察者对可能与不适或痛苦相关的行为进行评分。还评估了侧卧时间和呼吸停止(RA)时间。与先使用异氟烷麻醉再使用NaP相比,在清醒的鸟类中使用NaP能更快实现呼吸停止;然而,两种方法均未引起可能影响动物福利的行为,如明显的张嘴呼吸。在二氧化碳处理组中,所用的舱室置换率与张嘴呼吸持续时间、头部后屈发作时间和呼吸停止时间之间呈负相关。结果表明,在清醒、受约束的斑胸草雀中腹腔内注射NaP是一种快速有效的安乐死方法。如果使用二氧化碳对这些鸟类实施安乐死,高置换率(例如80%)将使操作持续时间和相关行为减至最少。

相似文献

7
Euthanasia.安乐死。
Curr Protoc Immunol. 2006 Jul;Chapter 1:1.8.1-1.8.4. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im0108s73.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验