Neuropsychobiology. 2017;75(3):100-116. doi: 10.1159/000485221. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
Schizophrenia research has been in a deadlock for many decades. Despite important advances in clinical treatment, there are still major concerns regarding long-term psychosocial reintegration and disease management, biological heterogeneity, unsatisfactory predictors of individual course and treatment strategies, and a confusing variety of controversial theories about its etiology and pathophysiological mechanisms. In the present perspective on schizophrenia research, we first discuss a methodological pitfall in contemporary schizophrenia research inherent in the attempt to link mental phenomena with the brain: we claim that the time-honored phenomenological method of defining mental symptoms should not be contaminated with the naturalistic approach of modern neuroscience. We then describe our Systems Neuroscience of Psychosis (SyNoPsis) project, which aims to overcome this intrinsic problem of psychiatric research. Considering schizophrenia primarily as a disorder of interindividual communication, we developed a neurobiologically informed semiotics of psychotic disorders, as well as an operational clinical rating scale. The novel psychopathology allows disentangling the clinical manifestations of schizophrenia into behavioral domains matching the functions of three well-described higher-order corticobasal brain systems involved in interindividual human communication, namely, the limbic, associative, and motor loops, including their corticocortical sensorimotor connections. The results of several empirical studies support the hypothesis that the proposed three-dimensional symptom structure, segregated into the affective, the language, and the motor domain, can be specifically mapped onto structural and functional abnormalities of the respective brain systems. New pathophysiological hypotheses derived from this brain system-oriented approach have helped to develop and improve novel treatment strategies with noninvasive brain stimulation and practicable clinical parameters. In clinical practice, the novel psychopathology allows confining the communication deficits of the individual patient, shifting attention from the symptoms to the intact resources. We have studied this approach and observed important advantages for therapeutic alliances, personalized treatment, and de-escalation strategies. Future studies will further conjoin clinical definitions of psychotic symptoms with brain structures and functions, and disentangle structural and functional deficit patterns within these systems to identify neurobiologically distinct subsyndromes. Neurobiologically homogeneous patient groups may provide new momentum for treatment research. Finally, lessons learned from schizophrenia research may contribute to developing a comprehensive perspective on human experience and behavior that integrates methodologically distinct, but internally consistent, insights from humanities and neuroscience.
精神分裂症研究已经陷入僵局数十年。尽管在临床治疗方面取得了重要进展,但在长期的社会心理再融入和疾病管理、生物学异质性、个体病程和治疗策略的预测不理想以及关于其病因和病理生理机制的各种有争议理论方面,仍存在重大问题。在本次精神分裂症研究的视角中,我们首先讨论了当代精神分裂症研究中固有的一种方法上的陷阱,即试图将心理现象与大脑联系起来:我们声称,定义心理症状的历史悠久的现象学方法不应受到现代神经科学的自然主义方法的污染。然后,我们描述了我们的精神病系统神经科学(SyNoPsis)项目,该项目旨在克服精神科研究中的这一内在问题。我们主要将精神分裂症视为人际交流障碍,因此开发了一种精神病障碍的神经生物学符号学,以及一种操作性临床评定量表。这种新颖的精神病理学允许将精神分裂症的临床表现分解为与三个参与人际交流的高级皮质基底大脑系统的功能相匹配的行为领域,即边缘系统、联想系统和运动系统,包括它们的皮质皮质感觉运动连接。几项实证研究的结果支持了以下假设,即所提出的三维症状结构,分为情感、语言和运动域,可以特异性映射到各自大脑系统的结构和功能异常。源自这种基于大脑系统的方法的新病理生理学假设有助于开发和改善具有非侵入性脑刺激和可行临床参数的新型治疗策略。在临床实践中,新颖的精神病理学允许将个体患者的沟通缺陷局限化,将注意力从症状转移到完整的资源上。我们已经研究了这种方法,并观察到了对治疗联盟、个性化治疗和降级策略的重要优势。未来的研究将进一步将精神病症状的临床定义与大脑结构和功能联系起来,并在这些系统中分解结构和功能缺陷模式,以识别具有神经生物学意义的亚综合征。具有神经生物学同质性的患者群体可能为治疗研究提供新的动力。最后,从精神分裂症研究中吸取的经验教训可能有助于形成一种全面的人类经验和行为视角,该视角整合了人文科学和神经科学中具有方法学差异但内部一致的见解。