Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Libraries and Cultural Resources, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):260. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0651-z.
Effective and efficient transitions in care between emergency medical services (EMS) practitioners and emergency department (ED) nurses is vital as poor clinical transitions in care may place patients at increased risk for adverse events such as delay in treatment for time sensitive conditions (e.g., myocardial infarction) or worsening of status (e.g., sepsis). Such transitions in care are complex and prone to communication errors primarily caused by misunderstanding related to divergent professional perspectives leading to misunderstandings that are further susceptible to contextual factors and divergent professional lenses. In this systematic review, we aim to examine (1) factors that mitigate or improve transitions in care specifically from EMS practitioners to ED nurses, and (2) effectiveness of interventional strategies that lead to improvements in communication and fewer adverse events.
We will search electronic databases (DARE, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP; Communication Abstracts); gray literature (gray literature databases, organization websites, querying experts in emergency medicine); and reference lists and conduct forward citation searches of included studies. All English-language primary studies will be eligible for inclusion if the study includes (1) EMS practitioners or ED nurses involved in transitions for arriving EMS patients; and (2) an intervention to improve transitions in care or description of factors that influence transitions in care (barriers/facilitators, perceptions, experiences, quality of information exchange). Two reviewers will independently screen titles/abstracts and full texts for inclusion and methodological quality. We will use narrative and thematic synthesis to integrate and explore relationships within the data. Should the data permit, a meta-analysis will be conducted.
This systematic review will help identify factors that influence communication between EMS and ED nurses during transitions in care, and identify interventional strategies that lead to improved communication and decrease in adverse events. The findings can be used to develop an evidence-informed transitions in care tool that ensures efficient transfer of accurate patient information, continuity of care, enhances patient safety, and avoids duplication of services. This review will also identify gaps in the existing literature to inform future research efforts.
PROSPERO CRD42017068844.
在紧急医疗服务(EMS)从业者和急诊科(ED)护士之间实现有效和高效的护理交接至关重要,因为护理交接过程中的临床问题可能会使患者面临不良事件的风险增加,例如对时间敏感的病症(如心肌梗死)的治疗延迟或病情恶化(如败血症)。这些护理交接非常复杂,容易出现沟通错误,主要是由于专业观点的差异导致误解,从而产生进一步受到语境因素和专业视角差异影响的误解。在本次系统评价中,我们旨在研究:(1)从 EMS 从业者到 ED 护士的护理交接中,减轻或改善交接的因素;(2)改善沟通和减少不良事件的干预策略的有效性。
我们将检索电子数据库(DARE、MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane、CINAHL、Joanna Briggs 循证卫生保健国际合作中心 EBP;Communication Abstracts);灰色文献(灰色文献数据库、组织网站、向急诊医学专家查询);并对纳入研究的参考文献进行追溯和正向引文检索。如果研究包括(1)参与 EMS 患者到达后护理交接的 EMS 从业者或 ED 护士;和(2)改善护理交接的干预措施或描述影响护理交接的因素(障碍/促进因素、感知、经验、信息交换质量),则所有英语原始研究都将符合纳入标准。两名评审员将独立筛选标题/摘要和全文以确定是否符合纳入标准和方法学质量。我们将使用叙述性和主题性综合分析来整合和探索数据中的关系。如果数据允许,将进行荟萃分析。
本次系统评价将有助于确定影响 EMS 和 ED 护士在护理交接期间沟通的因素,并确定可改善沟通和减少不良事件的干预策略。研究结果可用于开发基于证据的护理交接工具,以确保准确、高效地传递患者信息,保持护理连续性,提高患者安全性并避免服务重复。本次评价还将确定现有文献中的差距,为未来的研究工作提供信息。
PROSPERO CRD42017068844。