Suppr超能文献

球囊血管成形术与支架置入治疗失效动静脉移植物:荟萃分析。

Balloon Angioplasty Versus Stenting for the Treatment of Failing Arteriovenous Grafts: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Feb;55(2):249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.11.011. Epub 2017 Dec 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the outcomes of plain balloon angioplasty versus stenting for the treatment of failed or malfunctioning chronic haemodialysis arteriovenous grafts (AVGs).

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was undertaken using the PUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from January 2000 to September 2016 for articles comparing balloon angioplasty versus stenting in the management of failed or malfunctioning chronic haemodialysis AVGs. Results are reported as OR and 95% CI.

RESULTS

The search identified eight studies (1051 patients). Balloon angioplasty alone was used in 521 patients (49.6%) and stenting in 530 patients (50.4%). At the time of the endovascular re-intervention, the mean life of AVGs was 807.7±115.4 days for the balloon angioplasty and 714.2±96.3 days for the stenting group (p=.92). All AVGs were located in the arm. Most procedures (98.1%) were performed across the venous anastomosis, while 88% of the patients in the stenting group received a stent graft. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the stenting group (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08-0.31, p<.001). At 12 months, loss of primary and secondary patency was significantly higher in patients undergoing plain balloon angioplasty compared with stenting (OR 3.54, 95% CI 2.18-5.74, p<.001, and OR 1.82, 95% 1.17-2.82, p=.008, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Stenting is associated with better technical success and patency rates compared with plain angioplasty in treating failed or malfunctioning chronic haemodialysis AVGs, and thus it should be considered as the first line therapeutic option.

摘要

目的

评估普通球囊血管成形术与支架置入术治疗失败或功能障碍的慢性血液透析动静脉移植物(AVG)的结果。

方法

系统检索 2000 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月 PUBMED、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 数据库,比较球囊血管成形术与支架置入术治疗失败或功能障碍的慢性血液透析 AVG 的文献。结果以 OR 和 95%CI 表示。

结果

搜索共确定了 8 项研究(1051 例患者)。521 例(49.6%)患者仅行球囊血管成形术,530 例(50.4%)患者行支架置入术。血管腔内再干预时,球囊血管成形组 AVG 的平均生存时间为 807.7±115.4 天,支架组为 714.2±96.3 天(p=.92)。所有 AVG 均位于手臂。大多数手术(98.1%)均在静脉吻合口处进行,而支架组 88%的患者接受了支架移植物。支架组的技术成功率明显更高(OR 0.16,95%CI 0.08-0.31,p<.001)。12 个月时,与支架置入术相比,单纯球囊血管成形术患者的原发性和继发性通畅率明显降低(OR 3.54,95%CI 2.18-5.74,p<.001,OR 1.82,95%CI 1.17-2.82,p=.008)。

结论

与单纯血管成形术相比,支架置入术治疗失败或功能障碍的慢性血液透析 AVG 的技术成功率和通畅率更高,因此应将其作为一线治疗选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验