Suppr超能文献

胃切除术与食管切除术治疗 Siewert II 和 III 型胃食管交界处癌的比较,涉及切缘、淋巴结清扫和生存。

Gastrectomy compared to oesophagectomy for Siewert II and III gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer in relation to resection margins, lymphadenectomy and survival.

机构信息

Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, 17176, Stockholm, Sweden.

Cancer and Translational Medicine Research Unit, Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 19;7(1):17783. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18005-6.

Abstract

It is unclear whether gastrectomy or oesophagectomy offer better outcomes for gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancer. A total of 240 patients undergoing total gastrectomy (n = 85) or oesophagectomy (n = 155) for Siewert II-III GOJ adenocarcinoma were identified from a Swedish prospective population-based nationwide cohort. The surgical approaches were compared in relation to non-radical resection margins (main outcome) using multivariable logistic regression, providing odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), mean number of removed lymph nodes with standard deviation (SD) using ANCOVA, assessing mean differences and 95% CIs, and 5-year mortality using Cox regression estimating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. The models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity, tumour stage, and surgeon volume. The non-radical resection rate was 15% for gastrectomy and 14% for oesophagectomy, and the adjusted OR was 1.61 (95% CI 0.68-3.83). The mean number of lymph nodes removed was 14.2 (SD ± 9.6) for gastrectomy and 14.2 (SD ± 10.4) for oesophagectomy, with adjusted mean difference of 2.4 (95% CI-0.2-5.0). The 5-year mortality was 76% following gastrectomy and 75% following oesophagectomy, with adjusted HR = 1.07 (95% CI 0.78-1.47). Gastrectomy and oesophagectomy for Siewert II or III GOJ cancer seem comparable regarding tumour-free resection margins, lymph nodes removal, and 5-year survival.

摘要

对于胃食管交界处(GOJ)癌症,胃切除术或食管切除术哪种方法的治疗效果更好尚不清楚。从瑞典一项前瞻性基于人群的全国性队列中,共确定了 240 名接受全胃切除术(n=85)或食管切除术(n=155)治疗 Siewert II-III GOJ 腺癌的患者。使用多变量逻辑回归比较了两种手术方法在非根治性切除边缘方面的差异(主要结局),并提供了比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)、使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)计算的移除的淋巴结平均数及其标准差(SD),评估了均数差异及其 95%CI,以及使用 Cox 回归估计的 5 年死亡率及其 95%CI。这些模型调整了年龄、性别、合并症、肿瘤分期和外科医生手术量。胃切除术的非根治性切除率为 15%,食管切除术的非根治性切除率为 14%,调整后的 OR 为 1.61(95%CI 0.68-3.83)。胃切除术切除的淋巴结平均数为 14.2(SD±9.6),食管切除术为 14.2(SD±10.4),调整后的平均差异为 2.4(95%CI-0.2-5.0)。胃切除术的 5 年死亡率为 76%,食管切除术为 75%,调整后的 HR 为 1.07(95%CI 0.78-1.47)。对于 Siewert II 或 III GOJ 癌症,胃切除术和食管切除术在无肿瘤切除边缘、淋巴结切除和 5 年生存率方面似乎相似。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
BRAZILIAN GASTRIC CANCER ASSOCIATION GUIDELINES (PART 2): UPDATE ON TREATMENT.巴西胃癌协会指南(第二部分):治疗进展
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2021 May 14;34(1):e1563. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020210001e1563. eCollection 2021.
5
Advances in the surgical management of gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.胃及胃食管交界癌手术治疗的进展
Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan 5;6:16. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.02.06. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
The surgical management of esophago-gastric junctional cancer.食管胃交界部癌的外科治疗
Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;25(4):394-400. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
3
9
Adenocarcinoma at the gastroesophageal junction.胃食管结合部腺癌。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Sep;1325:211-25. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12535.
10
Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction.胃食管交界腺癌的外科治疗
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):597-603. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4047-1. Epub 2014 Sep 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验