Suppr超能文献

性唤起指数的心理测量分析。

A psychometric analysis of the sexual arousability index.

作者信息

Andersen B L, Broffitt B, Karlsson J A, Turnquist D C

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989 Feb;57(1):123-30. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.57.1.123.

Abstract

The Sexual Arousability Index (SAI) assesses self-reported sexual arousal in women and was administered on four occasions to a group of normal sexually active women (n = 57) and to another group undergoing surgical gynecologic treatment (n = 66) that resulted in a predictable and clinical level of sexual dysfunction. These data were used for a psychometric analysis of the SAI. In terms of reliability, internal consistency estimates were in the .92-.96 range, and 4-month test-retest reliabilities ranged from .74 to .90. An evaluation of validity revealed both strengths and limitations of the SAI. The content analysis indicated that at least six domains are sampled, including seduction activities, body caressing, oral-genital and genital stimulation, intercourse, masturbation, and erotic media. To examine construct validity, we conducted a factor analysis that revealed a five-factor solution accounting for 85% of the variance. Furthermore, the factor solution was stable across groups and time, and the factors were sensitive to the occurrence of important behavior changes. The SAI, like other psychological measures, was poor in predicting a criterion (i.e., the occurrence of inhibited sexual excitement) concurrently or at the time of follow-up.

摘要

性唤起指数(SAI)用于评估女性自我报告的性唤起情况,对一组正常性活跃女性(n = 57)以及另一组接受妇科手术治疗(n = 66)且出现可预测的临床水平性功能障碍的女性进行了四次测量。这些数据用于对SAI进行心理测量分析。在信度方面,内部一致性估计值在0.92 - 0.96范围内,4个月的重测信度在0.74至0.90之间。效度评估揭示了SAI的优势和局限性。内容分析表明,至少涵盖了六个领域,包括诱惑活动、身体抚摸、口交和生殖器刺激、性交、自慰以及色情媒介。为检验结构效度,我们进行了因子分析,结果显示一个五因子模型可解释85%的方差。此外,该因子模型在不同组和不同时间都很稳定,且这些因子对重要行为变化的发生很敏感。与其他心理测量工具一样,SAI在同时预测一个标准(即性兴奋抑制的发生)或随访时的预测能力较差。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验