Parker Matthew J S, Oliffe Michael T, McGill Neil W
a Department of Rheumatology, The Institute of Rheumatology and Orthopaedics , Royal Prince Alfred Hospital , Camperdown, Sydney , Australia.
b Sydney Medical School , The University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia.
Mod Rheumatol. 2018 Jul;28(4):676-680. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2017.1404179. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
The primary aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of digital photographs taken with a smartphone camera using both a lens attachment and, separately, a dermatoscope. The secondary aims were to assess the influence of prior capillaroscopy experience and familiarity with the novel techniques on diagnostic accuracy.
All patients referred for capillaroscopy between May 2016 and January 2017 were eligible for inclusion. Nailfolds were classified by widefield microscopy before proceeding double-blinded to nailfold photography using both novel techniques. Randomised photographs were assessed by three independent investigators and results were compared to widefield microscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, inter- and intra-observer variability were calculated.
Sixty-five participants contributed over 1000 digital photographs for assessment. The 'smartphone-lens' technique performed with moderate sensitivity (65%; 58-72) and high specificity (90%; 84-96). The 'smartphone-dermatoscope' technique performed with higher sensitivity (74%; 66-82) and excellent specificity (95%; 88-100) and was used more accurately by a novice. Prior assessor experience with nailfold capillaroscopy in general and prior experience with the novel techniques positively modulated the diagnostic accuracy.
New technologies, in this case utilising a smartphone camera, could help to improve accessibility to nailfold capillaroscopy, an important diagnostic tool and putative biomarker in scleroderma-spectrum disorders, whilst retaining accurate results.
主要目的是评估使用镜头附件和皮肤镜分别通过智能手机相机拍摄的数字照片的诊断性能。次要目的是评估毛细血管镜检查的既往经验以及对新技术的熟悉程度对诊断准确性的影响。
2016年5月至2017年1月间所有转诊进行毛细血管镜检查的患者均符合纳入标准。在使用两种新技术进行双盲甲襞摄影之前,通过广角显微镜对甲襞进行分类。由三名独立研究人员评估随机拍摄的照片,并将结果与广角显微镜检查结果进行比较。计算敏感性、特异性、观察者间和观察者内变异性。
65名参与者提供了超过1000张数字照片用于评估。“智能手机镜头”技术的敏感性中等(65%;58 - 72),特异性高(90%;84 - 96)。“智能手机皮肤镜”技术的敏感性更高(74%;66 - 82),特异性极佳(95%;88 - 100),并且新手使用起来更准确。评估者既往在甲襞毛细血管镜检查方面的经验以及对新技术的既往经验对诊断准确性有正向调节作用。
在这种情况下,利用智能手机相机的新技术有助于提高甲襞毛细血管镜检查的可及性,甲襞毛细血管镜检查是硬皮病谱系疾病中的一种重要诊断工具和假定生物标志物,同时能保持准确的结果。