Yogarajah Thinesshwary, Ong Kien Chai, Perera David, Wong Kum Thong
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
J Virol. 2018 Feb 26;92(6). doi: 10.1128/JVI.01914-17. Print 2018 Mar 15.
Coxsackievirus A16 (CV-A16) and enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) are closely related enteroviruses that cause the same hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD), but neurological complications occur only very rarely in CV-A16 compared to EV-A71 infections. To elucidate host responses that may be able to explain these differences, we performed transcriptomic analysis and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) in CV-A16-infected neuroblastoma cells (SK-N-SH), and the results showed that the radical -adenosylmethionine domain containing 2 (RSAD2) was the highest upregulated gene in the antimicrobial pathway. Increased RSAD2 expression was correlated with reduced viral replication, while RSAD2 knockdown cells were correlated with increased replication. EV-A71 replication showed no apparent correlation to RSAD2 expressions. Absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), which is associated with pyroptotic cell death, was upregulated in EV-A71-infected neurons but not in CV-A16 infection, suggesting that the AIM2 inflammasome played a significant role in suppressing EV-A71 replication. Chimeric viruses derived from CV-A16 and EV-A71 but containing swapped 5' nontranslated regions (5' NTRs) showed that RSAD2 expression/viral replication and AIM2 expression/viral replication patterns may be linked to the 5' NTRs of parental viruses. Differences in secondary structure of internal ribosomal entry sites within the 5' NTR may be responsible for these findings. Overall, our results suggest that CV-A16 and EV-A71 elicit different host responses to infection, which may help explain the apparent lower incidence of CV-A16-associated neurovirulence in HFMD outbreaks compared to EV-A71 infection. Although coxsackievirus A16 (CV-A16) and enterovirus A17 (EV-A71) both cause hand, foot, and mouth disease, EV-A71 has emerged as a leading cause of nonpolio, enteroviral fatal encephalomyelitis among young children. The significance of our research is in the identification of the possible differing and novel mechanisms of CV-A16 and EV-A71 inhibition in neuronal cells that may impact viral neuropathogenesis. We further showed that viral 5' NTRs may play significant roles in eliciting different host response mechanisms.
柯萨奇病毒A16(CV - A16)和肠道病毒A71(EV - A71)是密切相关的肠道病毒,可引起相同的手足口病(HFMD),但与EV - A71感染相比,CV - A16感染极少出现神经并发症。为了阐明可能解释这些差异的宿主反应,我们对CV - A16感染的神经母细胞瘤细胞(SK - N - SH)进行了转录组分析和实时定量PCR(RT - qPCR),结果表明,含2的自由基 - 腺苷甲硫氨酸结构域(RSAD2)是抗菌途径中上调最高的基因。RSAD2表达增加与病毒复制减少相关,而RSAD2敲低的细胞与病毒复制增加相关。EV - A71复制与RSAD2表达无明显相关性。与焦亡性细胞死亡相关的黑色素瘤缺失2(AIM2)在EV - A71感染的神经元中上调,但在CV - A16感染中未上调,这表明AIM2炎性小体在抑制EV - A71复制中起重要作用。源自CV - A16和EV - A71但含有互换的5'非翻译区(5' NTR)的嵌合病毒表明,RSAD2表达/病毒复制和AIM2表达/病毒复制模式可能与亲本病毒的5' NTR相关。5' NTR内内部核糖体进入位点二级结构的差异可能是这些结果的原因。总体而言,我们的结果表明,CV - A16和EV - A71引发不同的宿主感染反应,这可能有助于解释与EV - A71感染相比,CV - A16在手足口病暴发中相关神经毒力发病率明显较低的原因。尽管柯萨奇病毒A16(CV - A16)和肠道病毒A71(EV - A71)均引起手足口病,但EV - A71已成为幼儿非脊髓灰质炎肠道病毒性致命性脑脊髓炎 的主要病因。我们研究的意义在于确定CV - A16和EV - A71在神经元细胞中抑制作用可能不同的新机制,这些机制可能影响病毒神经发病机制。我们进一步表明,病毒5' NTR在引发不同的宿主反应机制中可能起重要作用。