Suppr超能文献

一项基于问卷的审计,以评估在体外受精治疗期间使用阴道黄体酮片(Lutigest)进行黄体期支持的患者的总体体验和便利性。

A questionnaire-based audit to assess overall experience and convenience among patients using vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest) for luteal phase support during IVF treatment.

作者信息

Heine Polly, Sellar Laura, Whitten Sue, Bajaj Priti

机构信息

Fertility Team, The Agora Gyneacology and Fertility Centre, Hove.

Medical Affairs, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, West Drayton, UK.

出版信息

Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2017 Dec 8;8:169-179. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S140678. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this audit was to assess the overall experience and patient convenience of vaginal progesterone tablets (Lutigest, marketed as Endometrin in the USA) used for luteal phase support (LPS) during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This questionnaire-based audit included responses from 100 patients undergoing IVF treatment at six IVF clinics in the UK from September 2015 to November 2016. Fourteen days after starting progesterone supplementation for LPS during their IVF treatment, patients rated overall experience and perceived convenience of the prescribed progesterone by completing a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients included, 96 received vaginal progesterone tablets for LPS. Overall, 53.1% (51/96) indicated that the progesterone tablets were "very easy" to use; 42.7% (41/96) and 44.8% (43/96) found it "very convenient" or "neither convenient or inconvenient" to administer the tablet, respectively. Overall experience with using progesterone tablets was rated as "very comfortable" by 34.4% (33/96) and "neither comfortable or uncomfortable" by 56.3% (54/96) of patients. The applicator was used by 93.8% (90/96) of patients to administer the tablet, and 86.5% (83/96) indicated that the applicator was easy to clean for repeated use. A total of 33 patients had a previous IVF cycle during which they were prescribed vaginal progesterone pessaries for LPS. Compared with progesterone pessaries, the majority found treatment with progesterone tablets to be more comfortable (60.6%; 20/33) and more convenient (57.6%; 19/33) and indicated that the progesterone tablet was their preferred progesterone formulation for LPS (60.6%; 20/33).

CONCLUSION

These findings offer insights into real-world patient experiences with the progesterone vaginal tablet formulation. The results suggest overall patient convenience, ease, and comfort with using progesterone vaginal tablets for LPS. The majority of patients found progesterone vaginal tablets more convenient and comfortable to use compared with progesterone pessaries.

摘要

目的

本次审核旨在评估在体外受精(IVF)治疗期间用于黄体期支持(LPS)的阴道用黄体酮片(Lutigest,在美国市场名为Endometrin)的总体使用体验和患者便利性。

患者与方法

这项基于问卷调查的审核纳入了2015年9月至2016年11月期间在英国六家IVF诊所接受IVF治疗的100名患者的回复。在IVF治疗期间开始补充黄体酮进行LPS治疗14天后,患者通过填写问卷对所开黄体酮的总体体验和感知便利性进行评分。

结果

在纳入的100名患者中,96名接受了用于LPS的阴道用黄体酮片。总体而言,53.1%(51/96)的患者表示黄体酮片“非常容易”使用;42.7%(41/96)和44.8%(43/96)的患者分别认为服用该片剂“非常方便”或“既不方便也不不便”。34.4%(33/96)的患者将使用黄体酮片的总体体验评为“非常舒适”,56.3%(54/96)的患者评为“既不舒适也不难受”。93.8%(90/96)的患者使用涂抹器给药,86.5%(83/96)的患者表示涂抹器易于清洁可重复使用。共有33名患者之前有过IVF周期,当时他们被开了用于LPS的阴道用黄体酮阴道栓。与黄体酮阴道栓相比,大多数患者发现使用黄体酮片治疗更舒适(60.6%;20/33)、更方便(57.6%;19/33),并表示黄体酮片是他们用于LPS的首选黄体酮制剂(60.6%;20/33)。

结论

这些发现为患者使用黄体酮阴道片剂的实际体验提供了见解。结果表明患者使用黄体酮阴道片进行LPS总体上方便、轻松且舒适。与黄体酮阴道栓相比,大多数患者发现黄体酮阴道片使用起来更方便、更舒适。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fa5/5726362/4d15d5019ac5/prom-8-169Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验