Juschten Jenny, Tuinman Pieter R, Juffermans Nicole P, Dixon Barry, Levi Marcel, Schultz Marcus J
Laboratory of Experimental Intensive Care and Anesthesiology (L·E·I·C·A), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Intensive Care and Research VUmc Intensive Care (REVIVE), VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Nov;5(22):444. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.08.23.
Pneumonia, inhalation trauma and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), typical causes of lung injury in critically ill patients, are all three characterized by dysregulated inflammation and coagulation in the lungs. Nebulized anticoagulants are thought to have beneficial effects as they could attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy and maybe even affect pulmonary inflammation. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed using terms referring to aspects of the condition ('pneumonia', 'inhalation trauma' and 'ARDS'), the intervention ('nebulized', 'vaporized', and 'aerosolized') and anticoagulants limited to agents that are commercially available and frequently given or tested in critically ill patients ['heparin', 'danaparoid', 'activated protein C' (APC), 'antithrombin' (AT) and 'tissue factor pathway inhibitor' (TFPI)]. The systematic search identified 16 articles reporting on preclinical studies and 11 articles reporting on human trials. All nebulized anticoagulants attenuate pulmonary coagulopathy in preclinical studies using various models for lung injury, but the effects on inflammation are less consistent. Nebulized heparin, danaparoid and TFPI, but not APC and AT also reduced systemic coagulation. Nebulized heparin in lung injury patients shows contradictory results, and there is concern over systemic side effects of this strategy. Future studies need to focus on the way to nebulize anticoagulants, as well as on efficient but safe dosages, and other side effects.
肺炎、吸入性创伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是危重症患者肺损伤的典型病因,这三种病症均以肺部炎症和凝血功能失调为特征。雾化抗凝剂被认为具有有益作用,因为它们可以减轻肺凝血功能障碍,甚至可能影响肺部炎症。我们使用了涉及病症方面(“肺炎”、“吸入性创伤”和“ARDS”)、干预措施(“雾化”、“汽化”和气溶胶化”)以及仅限于在危重症患者中常用或已进行测试的市售抗凝剂(“肝素”、“达那肝素”、“活化蛋白C”(APC)、“抗凝血酶”(AT)和“组织因子途径抑制剂”(TFPI))等术语对医学文献进行了系统检索。系统检索确定了16篇关于临床前研究的文章和11篇关于人体试验的文章。在使用各种肺损伤模型的临床前研究中,所有雾化抗凝剂均能减轻肺凝血功能障碍,但对炎症的影响则不太一致。雾化肝素、达那肝素和TFPI可降低全身凝血,而APC和AT则不能。肺损伤患者使用雾化肝素的结果相互矛盾,且人们担心该策略的全身性副作用。未来的研究需要关注雾化抗凝剂的方式以及有效但安全的剂量和其他副作用。