Suppr超能文献

姑息治疗中吸入雾化药物——德国姑息治疗从业者的一项调查

Inhaled nebulised medications in palliative care - a survey among palliative care practitioners in Germany.

作者信息

Mair Ruth, Schnell Annette, Steger-Arand Christine, Herr Wolfgang, Rechenmacher Michael

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

Centre for Palliative Care, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2025 May 4;24(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01761-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In palliative care, alternative routes for drug application besides the oral and intravenous administration are frequently necessary. Up-to-date, very little is known about the familiarity, use and perceived relevance of inhalative medications for symptom control among palliative care practitioners.

METHODS

We conducted an anonymous online survey among palliative care physicians throughout Germany between 09/2021 and 04/2022. The questionnaire covered participants' sociodemographics, as well as familiarity, perceived relevance and prescription practices regarding 21 nebulised drugs. Analysis was performed using methods of descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

108 fully completed questionnaires were analysed. Most of the participants were employed in palliative care for 5 + years. The administration of normal saline, mucoactive drugs, bronchodilators and steroids via nebulisation was a widely known and frequently used technique among the participants, as evidenced by its regular use in clinical routine. About 50% of the participants reported to know epinephrine and tranexamic acid for anti-oedematous or haemostyptic effects, respectively. Both drugs were considered "relevant" by more than 60% of the prescribers. Only a minority of participants reported to know and use nebulised opioids, iloprost, several antibiotics, heparin, ketamine and lidocaine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our survey shows that nebulised drugs are prescribed and considered relevant in palliative care. However, for several of the mentioned medications only limited data is available regarding use and effectivity. There is also uncertainty to what extent the existing data may be transferable into routine palliative care setting. Therefore, more evidence should be generated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

在姑息治疗中,除口服和静脉给药外,经常需要其他药物应用途径。目前,对于姑息治疗从业者使用吸入药物控制症状的熟悉程度、使用情况及感知相关性了解甚少。

方法

2021年9月至2022年4月期间,我们对德国各地的姑息治疗医生进行了一项匿名在线调查。问卷涵盖参与者的社会人口统计学信息,以及对21种雾化药物的熟悉程度、感知相关性和处方习惯。采用描述性统计方法进行分析。

结果

分析了108份完整填写的问卷。大多数参与者从事姑息治疗工作5年以上。通过雾化给予生理盐水、黏液活性药物、支气管扩张剂和类固醇是参与者中广为人知且常用的技术,临床常规中经常使用就证明了这一点。约50%的参与者报告分别了解用于抗水肿或止血作用的肾上腺素和氨甲环酸。超过60%的开处方者认为这两种药物“相关”。只有少数参与者报告了解并使用雾化阿片类药物、伊洛前列素、几种抗生素、肝素、氯胺酮和利多卡因。

结论

我们的调查表明,雾化药物在姑息治疗中被处方并被认为是相关的。然而,对于上述几种药物,关于其使用和有效性的可用数据有限。现有数据在多大程度上可转化为常规姑息治疗环境也存在不确定性。因此,应生成更多证据。

试验注册

不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/629c/12051283/7bc6ed4ec755/12904_2025_1761_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验