Suppr超能文献

转移性结直肠癌中持续输注氟尿嘧啶与传统推注方案的前瞻性随机对照研究:一项大西洋中部肿瘤项目研究。

A prospective randomized comparison of continuous infusion fluorouracil with a conventional bolus schedule in metastatic colorectal carcinoma: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study.

作者信息

Lokich J J, Ahlgren J D, Gullo J J, Philips J A, Fryer J G

机构信息

Cancer Center, Boston.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1989 Apr;7(4):425-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.4.425.

Abstract

One hundred seventy-nine patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer not previously treated with chemotherapy were entered into a prospective randomized clinical trial by the Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program (MAOP) to compare two schedules of delivery for single-agent fluorouracil (5-FU). The "standard" treatment was a schedule commonly employed in clinical practice, namely, a daily bolus dose administered intravenously (IV) for five consecutive days and repeated at 5-week intervals. The investigational treatment was a continuous infusion of 5-FU administered 24 hours a day for a protracted time (10 weeks or more). Both treatments were continued until the development of disease progression or unless interrupted for toxicity. Using stringent objective criteria requiring independent confirmation of x-ray or scan-documented response, the tumor response rate reached 7% (six of 87) for the bolus arm and 30% (26 of 87) for the infusion arms (P less than .001). Toxicity was substantially different for the two arms with major leukopenia observed only on the bolus arm, 22% developing grade 3 (severe) or grade 4 (life-threatening) leukopenia with four sepsis-related deaths. Hand-foot syndrome was observed only in the infusional arm, requiring treatment interruptions and dose reductions in 24% of patients, but with little impact on quality of life. In spite of the major difference in objective response rate, overall survival for the two groups was comparable. Administration of 5-FU as a continuous infusion for protracted periods clearly improves the therapeutic index for this agent in patients with advanced colon cancer with respect to response rate and reduced toxicity. This schedule appears workable in the community setting and yields response rates similar to those reported for 5-FU with high-dose leucovorin, but without the gastroin testinal toxicity profile of the latter combination.

摘要

179例先前未接受过化疗的晚期可测量结直肠癌患者被纳入大西洋中部肿瘤项目(MAOP)的一项前瞻性随机临床试验,以比较单药氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的两种给药方案。“标准”治疗是临床实践中常用的方案,即连续5天静脉推注每日剂量,每5周重复一次。研究性治疗是每天24小时持续输注5-FU一段较长时间(10周或更长时间)。两种治疗均持续至疾病进展或因毒性而中断。使用严格的客观标准,要求独立确认X线或扫描记录的反应,推注组的肿瘤反应率为7%(87例中的6例),输注组为30%(87例中的26例)(P小于0.001)。两组的毒性有很大差异,仅推注组观察到严重白细胞减少,22%发生3级(严重)或4级(危及生命)白细胞减少,4例死于败血症相关疾病。手足综合征仅在输注组观察到,24%的患者需要中断治疗和减少剂量,但对生活质量影响很小。尽管客观反应率有很大差异,但两组的总生存期相当。对于晚期结肠癌患者,长时间持续输注5-FU在反应率和降低毒性方面明显提高了该药物的治疗指数。该方案在社区环境中似乎可行,产生的反应率与高剂量亚叶酸钙联合5-FU报道的反应率相似,但没有后者组合的胃肠道毒性特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验