Yu Jerry Z, Rhee Connie M, Ferrey Antoney, Li Alex, Jin Anna, Chang Yongen, Reddy Uttam, Lau Wei Ling, Chou Jason, Inrig Jula, Kalantar-Zadeh Kamyar
Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of California Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA.
St Joseph's Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA.
Semin Dial. 2018 May;31(3):300-304. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12660. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
The vast majority of maintenance dialysis patients suffer from poor long-term survival rates and lower levels of health-related quality of life. However, home hemodialysis is a historically significant dialysis modality that has been associated with favorable outcomes as well as greater patient autonomy and control, yet only represents a small minority of the total dialysis performed in the United States. Some potential disadvantages of home hemodialysis include vascular access complications, infection-related hospitalizations, patient fatigue, and attrition. In addition, current barriers and challenges in expanding the utilization of this modality include limited patient and provider education and technical expertise. Here we report a 65-year old male with end-stage renal disease due to Alport's syndrome who has undergone 35 years of uninterrupted thrice-weekly home hemodialysis (ie, every Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday evening, each session lasting 3 to 3¼ hours in length) using a conventional hemodialysis machine who has maintained a high functional status allowing him to work 6-8 hours per day. The patient has been able to liberalize his dietary and fluid intake while only requiring 3-4 liters of ultrafiltration per treatment, despite having absence of residual kidney function. Through this case of extraordinary longevity and outcomes after 35 years of dialysis and a review of the literature, we illustrate the history of home hemodialysis, its significant clinical and psychosocial advantages, as well as the barriers that hinder its widespread adaptation.
绝大多数维持性透析患者长期生存率低,健康相关生活质量水平也较低。然而,家庭血液透析是一种具有历史意义的透析方式,与良好的治疗效果以及更高的患者自主性和控制权相关联,但在美国进行的透析总量中仅占一小部分。家庭血液透析的一些潜在缺点包括血管通路并发症、感染相关的住院治疗、患者疲劳和退出治疗。此外,目前在扩大这种透析方式的应用方面存在的障碍和挑战包括患者和医护人员教育及技术专长有限。在此,我们报告一例65岁男性,因阿尔波特综合征导致终末期肾病,使用传统血液透析机进行了35年不间断的每周三次家庭血液透析(即每周日、周二和周四晚上,每次治疗持续3至3¼小时),维持了较高的功能状态,使他能够每天工作6至8小时。尽管没有残余肾功能,但患者在每次治疗仅需3至4升超滤量的情况下,能够放宽饮食和液体摄入量。通过这个透析35年后有着非凡长寿和良好治疗效果的病例以及文献回顾,我们阐述了家庭血液透析的历史、其显著的临床和心理社会优势,以及阻碍其广泛应用的障碍。