• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性主动脉夹层的临床检查:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Clinical Examination for Acute Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.

Department of Undergraduate Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):397-412. doi: 10.1111/acem.13360. Epub 2018 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/acem.13360
PMID:29265487
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Acute aortic dissection is a life-threatening condition due to a tear in the aortic wall. It is difficult to diagnose and if missed carries a significant mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a librarian-assisted systematic review of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane database from 1968 to July 2016. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and data were extracted by two independent reviewers (agreement measured by kappa). Studies were combined if low clinical and statistical heterogeneity (I  < 30%). Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Bivariate random effects meta analyses using Revman 5 and SAS 9.3 were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 792 records: 60 were selected for full text review, nine studies with 2,400 participants were included (QUADAS-2 low risk of bias, κ = 0.89 [for full-text review]). Prevalence of aortic dissection ranged from 21.9% to 76.1% (mean ± SD = 39.1% ± 17.1%). The clinical findings increasing probability of aortic dissection were 1) neurologic deficit (n = 3, specificity = 95%, positive likelihood ratio [LR+] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.3-5.7, I  = 0%) and 2) hypotension (n = 4, specificity = 95%, LR+ = 2.9 95% CI = 1.8-4.6, I  = 42%), and decreasing probability were the absence of a widened mediastinum (n = 4, sensitivity = 76%-95%, negative likelihood ratio [LR-] = 0.14-0.60, I  = 93%) and an American Heart Association aortic dissection detection (AHA ADD) risk score < 1 (n = 1, sensitivity = 91%, LR- = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.15-0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Suspicion for acute aortic dissection should be raised with hypotension, pulse, or neurologic deficit. Conversely, a low AHA ADD score decreases suspicion. Clinical gestalt informed by high- and low-risk features together with an absence of an alternative diagnosis should drive investigation for acute aortic dissection.

摘要

目的

急性主动脉夹层是一种危及生命的疾病,其特征是主动脉壁撕裂。这种疾病难以诊断,如果漏诊,死亡率很高。

方法

我们在 1968 年至 2016 年 7 月期间,通过图书馆员协助进行了系统的 PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库检索。由两名独立评审员(通过 Kappa 进行评估)审查标题和摘要,并提取数据。如果临床和统计学异质性较低(I <30%),则将研究合并。使用 QUADAS-2 工具评估研究质量。使用 Revman 5 和 SAS 9.3 进行双变量随机效应荟萃分析。

结果

我们共确定了 792 条记录:60 条记录被选作全文审查,9 项研究纳入了 2400 名参与者(QUADAS-2 低偏倚风险,κ=0.89[用于全文审查])。主动脉夹层的患病率范围为 21.9%至 76.1%(平均值±标准差=39.1%±17.1%)。增加主动脉夹层可能性的临床发现包括:1)神经功能缺损(n=3,特异性=95%,阳性似然比[LR+]=4.4,95%置信区间[CI]为 3.3-5.7,I=0%)和 2)低血压(n=4,特异性=95%,LR+=2.9,95%CI 为 1.8-4.6,I=42%),降低可能性的是纵隔不增宽(n=4,敏感性=76%-95%,阴性似然比[LR-]=0.14-0.60,I=93%)和美国心脏协会主动脉夹层检出(AHA ADD)风险评分<1(n=1,敏感性=91%,LR-=0.22,95%CI 为 0.15-0.33)。

结论

出现低血压、脉搏异常或神经功能缺损时,应怀疑为急性主动脉夹层。相反,AHA ADD 评分较低可降低怀疑。临床特征与高风险和低风险特征相结合,且无其他诊断,应推动对急性主动脉夹层的检查。

相似文献

1
Clinical Examination for Acute Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急性主动脉夹层的临床检查:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):397-412. doi: 10.1111/acem.13360. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
2
Does this patient have an acute thoracic aortic dissection?这位患者是否患有急性胸主动脉夹层?
JAMA. 2002 May 1;287(17):2262-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2262.
3
What Is the Specificity of the Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score in a Low-prevalence Population?主动脉夹层检测风险评分在低发人群中的特异性如何?
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;26(6):632-638. doi: 10.1111/acem.13634. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
4
Systematic Review of Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score Plus D-dimer for Diagnostic Rule-out Of Suspected Acute Aortic Syndromes.主动脉夹层检测风险评分加 D-二聚体对疑似急性主动脉综合征的诊断排除规则的系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Oct;27(10):1013-1027. doi: 10.1111/acem.13969. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
5
High Risk Clinical Features for Acute Aortic Dissection: A Case-Control Study.急性主动脉夹层的高危临床特征:一项病例对照研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;25(4):378-387. doi: 10.1111/acem.13356. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
6
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of D-dimer as a Rule-out Test for Suspected Acute Aortic Dissection.D-二聚体作为疑似急性主动脉夹层排除试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;66(4):368-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.02.013. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
7
Sensitivity of the aortic dissection detection risk score, a novel guideline-based tool for identification of acute aortic dissection at initial presentation: results from the international registry of acute aortic dissection.主动脉夹层检测风险评分的敏感性:一种新的基于指南的工具,用于在初次就诊时识别急性主动脉夹层:来自国际急性主动脉夹层注册研究的结果。
Circulation. 2011 May 24;123(20):2213-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.988568. Epub 2011 May 9.
8
Acute aortic dissection in the ED: risk factors and predictors for missed diagnosis.急诊科急性主动脉夹层:漏诊的危险因素和预测因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;30(8):1622-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.11.017. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
9
Spontaneous Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Describing the Diagnostic Accuracy of History, Physical Examination, Imaging, and Lumbar Puncture With an Exploration of Test Thresholds.自发性蛛网膜下腔出血:一项系统评价和荟萃分析,描述病史、体格检查、影像学检查及腰椎穿刺的诊断准确性并探索检查阈值
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;23(9):963-1003. doi: 10.1111/acem.12984. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
10
Accuracy of aortic dissection detection risk score alone or with D-dimer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯使用主动脉夹层检测风险评分与联合 D-二聚体检测对主动脉夹层的检测准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S32-S39. doi: 10.1177/2048872620901831. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between Heart Rate and Mortality Risk in Patients With Acute Aortic Dissection: A Meta-Analysis.急性主动脉夹层患者心率与死亡风险的关系:一项荟萃分析
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 May 27;26(5):27755. doi: 10.31083/RCM27755. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Non-Inferiority Analysis of Electrocardiography Analysis Application vs. Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Screening Left Ventricular Dysfunction.心电图分析应用与床旁超声心动图筛查左心室功能障碍的非劣效性分析
Yonsei Med J. 2025 Mar;66(3):172-178. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2024.0148.
3
Evaluating current acute aortic syndrome pathways: Collaborative Acute Aortic Syndrome Project (CAASP).
评估当前急性主动脉综合征治疗路径:协作急性主动脉综合征项目(CAASP)。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae096.
4
Effectiveness of chest pain center accreditation on the hospital outcome of acute aortic dissection: a nationwide study in China.胸痛中心认证对急性主动脉夹层患者医院结局的影响:中国的一项全国性研究。
Mil Med Res. 2024 Aug 26;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40779-024-00565-0.
5
Diagnosing aortic dissection: A review of this elusive, lethal diagnosis.诊断主动脉夹层:对这一难以捉摸的致命诊断的综述。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Jul 8;5(4):e13225. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13225. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Prognostic impact of oral anticoagulation therapy and atrial fibrillation in patients with type B acute aortic dissection.口服抗凝治疗和心房颤动对B型急性主动脉夹层患者的预后影响
J Arrhythm. 2024 Mar 7;40(2):297-305. doi: 10.1002/joa3.13020. eCollection 2024 Apr.
7
Extensive Type A Aortic Arterial Dissection Presenting With Stroke Symptoms: A Case Report.以卒中症状为表现的广泛型A型主动脉夹层:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Mar 5;16(3):e55564. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55564. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
Lateral Abdominal Wall Hematoma Mimicking Aortic Dissection Presentation: A Case Report.酷似主动脉夹层表现的侧腹壁血肿:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Feb 22;16(2):e54717. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54717. eCollection 2024 Feb.
9
Understanding the current acute aortic syndrome (AAS) pathways-The Collaborative Acute Aortic Syndrome Project (CAASP) protocol.了解当前的急性主动脉综合征(AAS)途径-协作性急性主动脉综合征项目(CAASP)方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0297782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297782. eCollection 2024.
10
Can you accurately rule out acute aortic syndrome by restricting imaging of the aorta to the area of the patient's pain?仅凭对患者疼痛区域的主动脉成像,能否准确排除急性主动脉综合征?
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):719-723. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02179-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.