The Department of Emergency Medicine, Health Sciences North, Health Science North Research Institute, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, 41 Ramsey Lake Rd, Sudbury, ON, P3E 5J1, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Emerg Radiol. 2023 Dec;30(6):719-723. doi: 10.1007/s10140-023-02179-w. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a life-threatening condition necessitating timely and accurate diagnosis for appropriate treatment. Currently, the only way to rule out the diagnosis is advanced imaging. The most accessible is computed tomography of the entire aorta. Most scans are negative, exposing patients to radiation, increased time in the emergency department (ED), and non-significant incidental findings. This study investigated whether restricting imaging to the area of aortic-related pain accurately rules out AAS.
A health records review was conducted on consecutive cases from three academic EDs between 2015 and 2020. Data were extracted and verified from multiple sources. Participants included adults diagnosed with AAS based on radiological evidence. The diagnostic performance of the restricted imaging strategy was assessed; sensitivity and likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Data from 149 cases of AAS were collected, with the majority presenting with chest pain (46%) or abdominal pain (24%). The restricted imaging strategy demonstrated a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI 91.4-98.5%) in ruling out AAS. In a subset of patients with systolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg and without aortic aneurysm/repair (n = 86), the sensitivity was 100% (95% CI 96-100%).
Restricting imaging to the area of pain in hemodynamically stable patients without known aortic aneurysm provides a highly sensitive approach to ruling out AAS.
急性主动脉综合征(AAS)是一种危及生命的疾病,需要及时准确的诊断以进行适当的治疗。目前,排除诊断的唯一方法是先进的影像学检查。最容易获得的是整个主动脉的计算机断层扫描。大多数扫描结果为阴性,使患者暴露于辐射下,在急诊科(ED)停留时间延长,且发现非特异性偶然发现。本研究旨在探讨是否将影像学检查限制在与主动脉相关疼痛的区域内,是否能准确排除 AAS。
对 2015 年至 2020 年期间来自三个学术 ED 的连续病例进行了病历回顾。从多个来源提取和验证数据。纳入的参与者为根据影像学证据诊断为 AAS 的成年人。评估了限制影像学策略的诊断性能;计算了灵敏度和比值比及其 95%置信区间。
共收集了 149 例 AAS 病例,其中大多数患者表现为胸痛(46%)或腹痛(24%)。限制影像学策略排除 AAS 的灵敏度为 96%(95%CI 91.4-98.5%)。在一组收缩压>90mmHg 且无主动脉瘤/修复的患者(n=86)中,灵敏度为 100%(95%CI 96-100%)。
对于血流动力学稳定且无已知主动脉瘤的患者,将影像学检查限制在疼痛区域,可以高度敏感地排除 AAS。