Suppr超能文献

基本的关怀冲突:护士讲述夜间平衡患者睡眠与测量生命体征观察

A fundamental conflict of care: Nurses' accounts of balancing patients' sleep with taking vital sign observations at night.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Southampton, UK.

School of Health Sciences and Social Work, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) Wessex, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2018 May;27(9-10):1860-1871. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14234. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore why adherence to vital sign observations scheduled by an early warning score protocol reduces at night.

BACKGROUND

Regular vital sign observations can reduce avoidable deterioration in hospital. early warning score protocols set the frequency of these observations by the severity of a patient's condition. Vital sign observations are taken less frequently at night, even with an early warning score in place, but no literature has explored why.

DESIGN

A qualitative interpretative design informed this study.

METHODS

Seventeen semi-structured interviews with nursing staff working on wards with varying levels of adherence to scheduled vital sign observations. A thematic analysis approach was used.

RESULTS

At night, nursing teams found it difficult to balance the competing care goals of supporting sleep with taking vital sign observations. The night-time frequency of these observations was determined by clinical judgement, ward-level expectations of observation timing and the risk of disturbing other patients. Patients with COPD or dementia could be under-monitored, while patients nearing the end of life could be over-monitored.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we found an early warning score algorithm focused on deterioration prevention did not account for long-term management or palliative care trajectories. Nurses were therefore less inclined to wake such patients to take vital sign observations at night. However, the perception of widespread exceptions and lack of evidence regarding optimum frequency risks delegitimising the early warning score approach. This may pose a risk to patient safety, particularly patients with dementia or chronic conditions.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Nurses should document exceptions and discuss these with the wider team. Hospitals should monitor why vital sign observations are missed at night, identify which groups are under-monitored and provide guidance on prioritising competing expectations. early warning score protocols should take account of different care trajectories.

摘要

目的和目标

探讨为什么按照预警评分方案规定的时间进行生命体征观察的依从性会在夜间降低。

背景

定期进行生命体征观察可以减少医院内可避免的病情恶化。预警评分方案根据患者病情的严重程度设定这些观察的频率。即使有预警评分方案,生命体征观察在夜间的频率也较低,但目前尚无文献探讨原因。

设计

本研究采用定性解释设计。

方法

对在不同遵嘱进行规定的生命体征观察的病房工作的护理人员进行了 17 次半结构式访谈。采用主题分析方法。

结果

夜间,护理团队发现很难平衡支持睡眠和进行生命体征观察这两个相互竞争的护理目标。这些观察的夜间频率由临床判断、病房对观察时间的期望以及打扰其他患者的风险决定。COPD 或痴呆患者可能监测不足,而接近生命终点的患者可能监测过度。

结论

在这项研究中,我们发现,专注于预防恶化的预警评分算法没有考虑长期管理或姑息治疗轨迹。因此,护士不太倾向于在夜间叫醒这些患者进行生命体征观察。然而,普遍存在例外情况的看法以及缺乏关于最佳频率的证据,可能会使预警评分方法失去合法性。这可能对患者安全构成风险,尤其是痴呆或慢性病患者。

临床实践的相关性

护士应记录例外情况,并与更广泛的团队进行讨论。医院应监测为什么夜间会错过生命体征观察,确定哪些群体监测不足,并提供关于优先考虑竞争期望的指导。预警评分方案应考虑不同的护理轨迹。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验