Donaldson Liam J, Panesar Sukhmeet S, Darzi Ara
Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS Med. 2014 Jun 24;11(6):e1001667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001667. eCollection 2014 Jun.
Hospital mortality is increasingly being regarded as a key indicator of patient safety, yet methodologies for assessing mortality are frequently contested and seldom point directly to areas of risk and solutions. The aim of our study was to classify reports of deaths due to unsafe care into broad areas of systemic failure capable of being addressed by stronger policies, procedures, and practices. The deaths were reported to a patient safety incident reporting system after mandatory reporting of such incidents was introduced.
The UK National Health Service database was searched for incidents resulting in a reported death of an adult over the period of the study. The study population comprised 2,010 incidents involving patients aged 16 y and over in acute hospital settings. Each incident report was reviewed by two of the authors, and, by scrutinising the structured information together with the free text, a main reason for the harm was identified and recorded as one of 18 incident types. These incident types were then aggregated into six areas of apparent systemic failure: mismanagement of deterioration (35%), failure of prevention (26%), deficient checking and oversight (11%), dysfunctional patient flow (10%), equipment-related errors (6%), and other (12%). The most common incident types were failure to act on or recognise deterioration (23%), inpatient falls (10%), healthcare-associated infections (10%), unexpected per-operative death (6%), and poor or inadequate handover (5%). Analysis of these 2,010 fatal incidents reveals patterns of issues that point to actionable areas for improvement.
Our approach demonstrates the potential utility of patient safety incident reports in identifying areas of service failure and highlights opportunities for corrective action to save lives.
医院死亡率日益被视为患者安全的关键指标,然而评估死亡率的方法经常受到争议,且很少能直接指出风险领域和解决方案。我们研究的目的是将因不安全护理导致的死亡报告分类为可通过更强有力的政策、程序和做法加以解决的广泛系统性故障领域。这些死亡事件是在引入此类事件的强制报告制度后报告给患者安全事件报告系统的。
在英国国家医疗服务体系数据库中搜索在研究期间导致成年患者报告死亡的事件。研究人群包括2010起涉及16岁及以上急性医院环境中患者的事件。每份事件报告由两位作者进行审查,通过仔细审查结构化信息和自由文本,确定伤害的主要原因并记录为18种事件类型之一。然后将这些事件类型汇总为六个明显的系统性故障领域:病情恶化管理不善(35%)、预防失败(26%)、检查和监督不足(11%)、患者流程功能失调(10%)、与设备相关的错误(6%)以及其他(12%)。最常见的事件类型是对病情恶化未采取行动或未识别(23%)、住院患者跌倒(10%)、医疗相关感染(10%)、手术中意外死亡(6%)以及交接不佳或不充分(5%)。对这2010起致命事件的分析揭示了一些问题模式,这些模式指向了可采取行动的改进领域。
我们的方法证明了患者安全事件报告在识别服务失败领域方面的潜在效用,并突出了采取纠正行动以挽救生命的机会。