• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性肉瘤的肺切除术:初次治疗后的总生存期

Lung resection for metastatic sarcomas: total survival from primary treatment.

作者信息

Pastorino U, Valente M, Gasparini M, Azzarelli A, Santoro A, Alloisio M, Ongari M, Tavecchio L, Ravasi G

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;40(4):275-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930400414.

DOI:10.1002/jso.2930400414
PMID:2927140
Abstract

The results of surgical management of 63 cases of pulmonary metastases from bone and soft tissue sarcomas, admitted at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, between 1970 and 1987, are reviewed in this paper. To estimate the relative impact of metastasectomy on the overall performance of treatment, survival curves were calculated from the time of first thoracotomy, as well as from the initial treatment of primary sarcoma. In the present series, total actuarial survival at 10 years was 37% for osteosarcoma, 27% for soft tissue sarcomas, and 24% for the other bone sarcomas, with a median survival of 48, 56, and 36 months, respectively. Five-year survival from the first pulmonary resection was influenced by the number of metastases and the length of the first disease-free interval only in osteosarcoma, while in soft tissue sarcomas a major untoward factor was represented by local recurrence at the site of the primary tumor. These data support the concept of pulmonary metastasectomy as effective salvage therapy for radically treated sarcomas; this management can rescue a significant proportion of all relapsed patients.

摘要

本文回顾了1970年至1987年间米兰国立肿瘤研究所收治的63例骨肉瘤和软组织肉瘤肺转移患者的外科治疗结果。为评估肺转移瘤切除术对整体治疗效果的相对影响,从首次开胸手术时间以及原发性肉瘤的初始治疗时间开始计算生存曲线。在本系列研究中,骨肉瘤10年总精算生存率为37%,软组织肉瘤为27%,其他骨肉瘤为24%,中位生存期分别为48、56和36个月。仅在骨肉瘤中,首次肺切除术后的5年生存率受转移灶数量和首个无病间期时长的影响,而在软组织肉瘤中,主要的不良因素是原发肿瘤部位的局部复发。这些数据支持了肺转移瘤切除术作为根治性治疗肉瘤有效挽救疗法的概念;这种治疗方法可以挽救相当一部分复发患者。

相似文献

1
Lung resection for metastatic sarcomas: total survival from primary treatment.转移性肉瘤的肺切除术:初次治疗后的总生存期
J Surg Oncol. 1989 Apr;40(4):275-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.2930400414.
2
Resection of lung metastases from soft-tissue sarcomas. A multivariate analysis.软组织肉瘤肺转移灶的切除术。一项多因素分析。
Arch Surg. 1992 Dec;127(12):1407-11. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420120041007.
3
[Pulmonary metastasectomy for osteosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas].骨肉瘤和软组织肉瘤的肺转移瘤切除术
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Sep;31(9):1319-23.
4
Surgical treatment of metastatic pulmonary soft-tissue sarcoma.
Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Jun;14(6):835-41; discussion 842-4, 847.
5
Pulmonary metastatectomy for soft tissue sarcomas: is it valuable?软组织肉瘤的肺转移瘤切除术:有价值吗?
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2001 Dec;42(6):835-40.
6
Survival following Pulmonary Metastasectomy for Sarcoma.肉瘤肺转移瘤切除术后的生存情况。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;64(2):146-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1546430. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
7
Predictors of long-term survival with pulmonary metastasectomy for osteosarcomas and soft tissue sarcomas.骨肉瘤和软组织肉瘤肺转移瘤切除术长期生存的预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Oct;47(5):603-8.
8
Response to chemotherapy does not predict survival after resection of sarcomatous pulmonary metastases.化疗反应不能预测肉瘤肺转移切除术后的生存情况。
Ann Thorac Surg. 1991 Feb;51(2):219-24. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(91)90789-s.
9
Resection of recurrent pulmonary metastases in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas.
Arch Surg. 1986 Nov;121(11):1248-52. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.121.11.1248.
10
Aggressive pulmonary metastasectomy for soft tissue sarcomas.软组织肉瘤的积极肺转移瘤切除术
Cancer. 1993 Sep 15;72(6):1919-25. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930915)72:6<1919::aid-cncr2820720621>3.0.co;2-d.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulmonary metastasectomy from soft tissue sarcomas.软组织肉瘤肺转移切除术。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2010;65(9):871-6. doi: 10.1590/s1807-59322010000900010.