School of Environment, Natural Resources & Geography, Bangor University, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
School of Environment, Natural Resources & Geography, Bangor University, Environment Centre Wales, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK; School of Geography, Geology and the Environment, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 May 15;624:807-819. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.179. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
Riparian areas, the interface between land and freshwater ecosystems, are considered to play a pivotal role in the supply of regulating, provisioning, cultural and supporting services. Most previous studies, however, have tended to focus on intensive agricultural systems and only on a single ecosystem function. Here, we present the first study which attempts to assess a wide range of ecological processes involved in the provision of the ecosystem service of water quality regulation across a diverse range of riparian typologies. Specifically, we focus on 1) evaluating the spatial variation in riparian soils properties with respect to distance with the river and soil depth in contrasting habitat types; 2) gaining further insights into the underlying mechanisms of pollutant removal (i.e. pesticide sorption/degradation, denitrification, etc.) by riparian soils; and 3) quantify and evaluate how riparian vegetation across different habitat types contribute to the provision of watercourse shading. All the habitats were present within a single large catchment and included: (i) improved grassland, (ii) unimproved (semi-natural) grassland, (iii) broadleaf woodland, (iv) coniferous woodland, and (iv) mountain, heath and bog. Taking all the data together, the riparian soils could be statistically separated by habitat type, providing evidence that they deliver ecosystem services to differing extents. Overall, however, our findings seem to contradict the general assumption that soils in riparian area are different from neighbouring (non-riparian) areas and that they possess extra functionality in terms of ecosystem service provision. Watercourse shading was highly habitat specific and was maximal in forests (ca. 52% shade cover) in comparison to the other habitat types (7-17%). Our data suggest that the functioning of riparian areas in less intensive agricultural areas, such as those studied here, may be broadly predicted from the surrounding land use, however, further research is required to critically test this across a wider range of ecosystems.
河岸带地区是陆地和淡水生态系统的交界处,被认为在提供调节、供应、文化和支持服务方面发挥着关键作用。然而,大多数先前的研究往往集中在集约化农业系统上,并且只关注单一的生态系统功能。在这里,我们首次尝试评估广泛的生态过程,这些过程涉及到不同河岸带类型的水质调节生态系统服务的提供。具体来说,我们专注于:1)评估与河流距离和土壤深度有关的河岸带土壤特性的空间变化,在不同的生境类型中;2)深入了解河岸带土壤去除污染物的潜在机制(即农药吸附/降解、反硝化等);3)量化和评估不同生境类型的河岸带植被如何为河道遮荫做出贡献。所有的栖息地都存在于一个单一的大流域中,包括:(i)改良草地、(ii)未改良(半自然)草地、(iii)阔叶林、(iv)针叶林和(iv)山地、石南荒地和沼泽。综合所有数据,根据生境类型可以对河岸带土壤进行统计上的区分,这表明它们在不同程度上提供了生态系统服务。然而,总的来说,我们的研究结果似乎与一般假设相矛盾,即河岸带的土壤与相邻(非河岸带)地区不同,并且在提供生态系统服务方面具有额外的功能。河道遮荫高度依赖于生境,在森林中(约 52%的遮荫率)最大,与其他生境类型(7-17%)相比。我们的数据表明,在像这里研究的这种集约化程度较低的农业地区,河岸带的功能可以从周围土地利用情况大致预测,然而,需要进一步的研究来在更广泛的生态系统范围内对此进行批判性测试。