Aller Marta-Beatriz, Vargas Ingrid, Coderch Jordi, Vázquez Maria-Luisa
Health Policy and Health Services Research Group; Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Avinguda Tibidabo 21, 08022, Barcelona, Spain.
Grup de Recerca en Serveis Sanitaris i Resultats en Salut; Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà, Hospital, 17-19 Edif. Fleming, 17230, Palamós, Spain.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 22;17(1):842. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2690-5.
Clinical coordination is considered a health policy priority as its absence can lead to poor quality of care and inefficiency. A key challenge is to identify which strategies should be implemented to improve coordination. The aim is to analyse doctors' opinions on the contribution of mechanisms to improving clinical coordination between primary and outpatient secondary care and the factors influencing their use.
A qualitative descriptive study in three healthcare networks of the Catalan national health system. A two-stage theoretical sample was designed: in the first stage, networks with different management models were selected; in the second, primary care (n = 26) and secondary care (n = 24) doctors. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Final sample size was reached by saturation. A thematic content analysis was conducted, segmented by network and care level.
With few differences across networks, doctors identified similar mechanisms contributing to clinical coordination: 1) shared EMR facilitating clinical information transfer and uptake; 2) mechanisms enabling problem-solving communication and agreement on clinical approaches, which varied across networks (joint clinical case conferences, which also promote mutual knowledge and training of primary care doctors; virtual consultations through EMR and email); and 3) referral protocols and use of the telephone facilitating access to secondary care after referrals. Doctors identified organizational (insufficient time, incompatible timetables, design of mechanisms) and professional factors (knowing each other, attitude towards collaboration, concerns over misdiagnosis) that influence the use of mechanisms.
Mechanisms that most contribute to clinical coordination are feedback mechanisms, that is those based on mutual adjustment, that allow doctors to exchange information and communicate. Their use might be enhanced by focusing on adequate working conditions, mechanism design and creating conditions that promote mutual knowledge and positive attitudes towards collaboration.
临床协调被视为一项卫生政策重点,因为缺乏临床协调会导致医疗质量低下和效率不高。一个关键挑战是确定应实施哪些策略来改善协调。目的是分析医生对于各种机制在改善初级保健与门诊二级保健之间临床协调方面的作用以及影响这些机制使用的因素的看法。
在加泰罗尼亚国家卫生系统的三个医疗网络中开展一项定性描述性研究。设计了一个两阶段的理论样本:第一阶段,选择具有不同管理模式的网络;第二阶段,选取初级保健医生(n = 26)和二级保健医生(n = 24)。通过半结构化访谈收集数据。达到饱和状态后确定最终样本量。进行了主题内容分析,按网络和医疗级别进行划分。
各网络之间差异不大,医生们确定了有助于临床协调的类似机制:1)共享电子病历有助于临床信息的传递和获取;2)能够促进解决问题的沟通并就临床方法达成一致的机制,不同网络有所不同(联合临床病例讨论会,这也促进了初级保健医生之间的相互了解和培训;通过电子病历和电子邮件进行的虚拟会诊);3)转诊协议以及电话的使用便于转诊后获得二级保健服务。医生们确定了影响机制使用的组织因素(时间不足、时间表不兼容、机制设计)和专业因素(相互了解、合作态度、对误诊的担忧)。
对临床协调贡献最大的机制是反馈机制,即基于相互调整的机制,它使医生能够交流信息并进行沟通。通过关注适当的工作条件、机制设计以及创造促进相互了解和积极合作态度的条件,可能会增加这些机制的使用。