Ahmed Osman, Patel Ketan, Rabei Rana, Patel Mikin V, Ginsburg Michael, Clayton Bishir, Arslan Bulent
Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 450, Chicago, Illinois, 60612.
Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Rush University Medical Center, 1725 W. Harrison Street, Suite 450, Chicago, Illinois, 60612.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Feb;29(2):159-169. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.028. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
To evaluate annual national trends in hemodialysis access maintenance procedures in the Medicare population by specialty and setting.
Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary Master Files between 2005 and 2015 were analyzed for procedure codes of hemodialysis access angiography and percutaneous thrombectomy. Using physician specialty codes, component procedure volume for endovascular services were queried for radiology, medicine, and surgery. Data entries were analyzed by provider specialty and place of service. Average submitted and allowed charges per intervention were extracted. Linear regression modeling was used to identify trends in number of and allowed charges by specialty and practice setting.
Between 2005 and 2015, the frequency of dialysis access angiography for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries increased by a total of 74.71% (211,181 to 368,955). Specialty-specific analysis demonstrated volume increases of 220.21% (22,128 to 101,109) for surgery, 249.02% (32,690 to 114,094) for medicine, and 2.81% (135,564 to 139, 367) for radiology. By 2015, an increased trend from hospital-based to non-hospital-based procedures associated with significantly higher reimbursement rates to providers (+18,798 non-hospital-based cases/year, $46.95/year, P ≤ .001) was also observed, with medicine performing the highest volume of non-hospital-based procedures. In this period, there was also a modest total overall increase of percutaneous thrombectomy procedures by 7.75% (61,485 to 66,250).
The frequency of endovascular hemodialysis access maintenance procedures in the Medicare fee-for-service program has increased from 2005 to 2015, with the majority market share transitioning from radiologists to non-radiologists. Similarly, most access maintenance in this time period changed from hospital-based to non-hospital-based interventions.
按专业和治疗地点评估医疗保险人群中血液透析通路维护程序的年度全国趋势。
分析2005年至2015年医疗保险医师供应商程序汇总主文件中的血液透析通路血管造影和经皮血栓切除术的程序代码。使用医师专业代码,查询放射科、内科和外科血管内服务的组成程序量。按提供者专业和服务地点分析数据条目。提取每次干预的平均提交费用和允许费用。使用线性回归模型确定按专业和执业地点的程序数量和允许费用的趋势。
2005年至2015年期间,医疗保险按服务收费受益人的透析通路血管造影频率总共增加了74.71%(从211,181例增至368,955例)。特定专业分析显示,外科的程序量增加了220.21%(从22,128例增至101,109例),内科增加了249.02%(从32,690例增至114,094例),放射科增加了2.81%(从135,564例增至139,367例)。到2015年,还观察到从基于医院的程序到非基于医院的程序的增加趋势,这与向提供者支付的报销率显著提高相关(每年增加18,798例非基于医院的病例,每年增加46.95美元,P≤0.001),内科进行的非基于医院的程序量最高。在此期间,经皮血栓切除术程序总体也有适度增加,增幅为7.75%(从61,485例增至66,250例)。
2005年至2015年期间,医疗保险按服务收费计划中血管内血液透析通路维护程序的频率有所增加,大部分市场份额从放射科医生转向非放射科医生。同样,在此期间,大多数通路维护从基于医院的干预转变为非基于医院的干预。