Department of Radiology, New York University Langone Health, 660 First Avenue, 3(rd) Floor, New York, NY 10016.
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jul;30(7):1050-1056.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 May 24.
To evaluate the changing use of transcatheter hemodialysis conduit procedures.
Multiple Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services datasets were used to assess hemodialysis conduit angiography. Use was normalized per 100,000 beneficiaries and stratified by specialty and site of service.
From 2001 to 2015, hemodialysis angiography use increased from 385 to 1,045 per 100,000 beneficiaries (compound annual growth rate [CAGR], +7.4%)]. Thrombectomy use increased from 114 to 168 (CAGR, +2.8%). Angiography and thrombectomy changed, by specialty, +1.5% and -1.3% for radiologists, +18.4% and +14.4% for surgeons, and +24.0% and +17.7% for nephrologists, respectively. By site, angiography and thrombectomy changed +29.1% and +20.7% for office settings and +0.8% and -2.4% for hospital settings, respectively. Radiologists' angiography and thrombectomy market shares decreased from 81.5% to 37.0% and from 84.2% to 47.3%, respectively. Angiography use showed the greatest growth for nephrologists in the office (from 5 to 265) and the greatest decline for radiologists in the hospital (299 to 205). Across states in 2015, there was marked variation in the use of angiography (0 [Wyoming] to 1173 [Georgia]) and thrombectomy (0 [6 states] to 275 [Rhode Island]). Radiologists' angiography and thrombectomy market shares decreased in 48 and 31 states, respectively, in some instances dramatically (eg, angiography in Nevada from 100.0% to 6.7%).
Dialysis conduit angiography use has grown substantially, more so than thrombectomy. This growth has been accompanied by a drastic market shift from radiologists in hospitals to nephrologists and surgeons in offices. Despite wide geographic variability nationally, radiologist market share has declined in most states.
评估经导管血液透析导管手术的使用变化。
使用多个医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心数据集评估血液透析导管血管造影术。使用量按每 10 万名受益人的数量进行标准化,并按专业和服务地点进行分层。
2001 年至 2015 年,每 10 万名受益人的血液透析血管造影术使用量从 385 例增加到 1045 例(复合年增长率 [CAGR],+7.4%)。血栓切除术的使用从 114 例增加到 168 例(CAGR,+2.8%)。按专业划分,放射科医生的血管造影术和血栓切除术分别增加了+1.5%和-1.3%,外科医生增加了+18.4%和+14.4%,肾病学家分别增加了+24.0%和+17.7%。按地点划分,血管造影术和血栓切除术在办公室的使用量分别增加了+29.1%和+20.7%,在医院的使用量分别减少了+0.8%和-2.4%。放射科医生的血管造影术和血栓切除术市场份额分别从 81.5%降至 37.0%和从 84.2%降至 47.3%。在办公室,肾病学家的血管造影术使用量增长最大(从 5 例增加到 265 例),而放射科医生在医院的血管造影术使用量下降最大(从 299 例降至 205 例)。2015 年,在全美各州,血管造影术(从 0[怀俄明州]到 1173[佐治亚州])和血栓切除术(从 0[6 个州]到 275[罗得岛州])的使用情况存在明显差异。在 48 个州和 31 个州,放射科医生的血管造影术和血栓切除术市场份额下降,在某些情况下急剧下降(例如,内华达州的血管造影术从 100.0%降至 6.7%)。
血液透析导管血管造影术的使用量有了实质性的增长,增长幅度超过了血栓切除术。这种增长伴随着从医院放射科医生到办公室的肾病医生和外科医生的市场份额的急剧转移。尽管全国范围内存在广泛的地理差异,但在大多数州,放射科医生的市场份额都有所下降。