Suppr超能文献

瞬间吸烟环境作为社会经济地位与吸烟之间关系的中介。

Momentary smoking context as a mediator of the relationship between SES and smoking.

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 34, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia.

Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, 130 N. Bellefield Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;83:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 15.

Abstract

There is a well-established socioeconomic gradient in smoking behavior: those with lower socioeconomic status smoke more. However, much less is known about the mechanisms explaining how SES is linked to smoking. This study takes a social-ecological perspective by examining whether socioeconomic status affects smoking behavior by differential exposure to places where smoking is allowed. Exposure to smoking restrictions was assessed in real-time using Ecological Momentary Assessment methods. A sample of 194 daily smokers, who were not attempting to quit, recorded their smoking and information about situational and contextual factors for three weeks using an electronic diary. We tested whether a smoker's momentary context mediated the relationship between socioeconomic status (educational attainment) and cigarettes smoked per day (CPD). Momentary context was operationalized as the proportion of random assessments answered in locations where smoking was allowed versus where smoking was not allowed. Data were analysed using multilevel regression (measurements nested within participants) with a lower level mediation model (2-1-1 mediation). Although no significant direct effect of SES on CPD were observed, there was a significant indirect effect of SES on CPD via the momentary context. Compared to participants with higher education, lower educated participants were more likely to encounter places where smoking was allowed, and this in turn, was associated with a higher number of CPD. These findings suggest that SES is associated with smoking at least partially via differential exposure to smoking-friendly environments, with smokers from lower SES backgrounds accessing more places where smoking is allowed. Implications for current smoke-free legislation are discussed.

摘要

吸烟行为存在着明确的社会经济梯度

社会经济地位较低的人吸烟较多。然而,对于社会经济地位如何与吸烟行为相关的机制,我们知之甚少。本研究从社会生态学的角度出发,通过考察社会经济地位是否通过对允许吸烟的场所的不同暴露来影响吸烟行为。使用生态瞬时评估方法实时评估社会经济地位对吸烟限制的暴露。研究对象为 194 名非戒烟的日常吸烟者,他们使用电子日记记录了他们的吸烟情况以及与情境和背景因素相关的信息,为期三周。我们测试了吸烟者的瞬时环境是否调节了社会经济地位(教育程度)与每天吸烟量(CPD)之间的关系。瞬时环境被定义为在允许吸烟的地点和不允许吸烟的地点回答的随机评估比例。使用多层次回归(在参与者内嵌套的测量)和较低水平的中介模型(2-1-1 中介)进行数据分析。尽管没有观察到 SES 对 CPD 的直接显著影响,但 SES 对 CPD 的间接影响是通过瞬时环境产生的。与受过高等教育的参与者相比,受教育程度较低的参与者更有可能遇到允许吸烟的地方,而这反过来又与 CPD 数量的增加有关。这些发现表明,SES 与吸烟的关联至少部分是通过对吸烟友好环境的不同暴露而产生的,社会经济地位较低的吸烟者更容易接触到允许吸烟的地方。讨论了当前无烟立法的影响。

相似文献

1
Momentary smoking context as a mediator of the relationship between SES and smoking.
Addict Behav. 2018 Aug;83:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
Socioeconomic status, mindfulness, and momentary associations between stress and smoking lapse during a quit attempt.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Apr 1;209:107840. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107840. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
5
Daily stress as link between disadvantage and smoking: an ecological momentary assessment study.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 12;19(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7631-2.
6
Socio-economic status in relation to smoking: The role of (expected and desired) social support and quitter identity.
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:41-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
7
Social cognitions and smoking behaviour: Temporal resolution matters.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(1):210-227. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12402. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
8
The Time-Varying Relations Between Risk Factors and Smoking Before and After a Quit Attempt.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2018 Sep 4;20(10):1231-1236. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntx225.
9
Predicting Smoking Lapses in the First Week of Quitting: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study.
J Addict Med. 2018 Jan/Feb;12(1):65-71. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000365.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Smoking and Quitting in Low-Income Contexts: A Qualitative Analysis with Implications for Practice and Policy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jul 16;22(7):1122. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22071122.
3
Prevalence and risk factors for refractive error in older adults in eight ethnicities in China: The China national health survey.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 15;10(17):e36354. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36354. eCollection 2024 Sep 15.
5
Intergenerational transmission of parental risky health behaviors in Chinese children: Are there socioeconomic status differences?
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;9:842817. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.842817. eCollection 2022.
6
Community social environments and cigarette smoking.
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Jul 16;19:101167. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101167. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Daily stress as link between disadvantage and smoking: an ecological momentary assessment study.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 12;19(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7631-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Socio-economic status and theories of health behaviour: Time to upgrade a control variable.
Br J Health Psychol. 2017 Feb;22(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12205.
2
Multilevel Modeling of Individual and Group Level Mediated Effects.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2001 Apr 1;36(2):249-77. doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3602_06.
3
Stimulus control in intermittent and daily smokers.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;29(4):847-55. doi: 10.1037/adb0000052. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
Craving in intermittent and daily smokers during ad libitum smoking.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1063-9. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu023. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
6
Smoking patterns and stimulus control in intermittent and daily smokers.
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e89911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089911. eCollection 2014.
7
Smoking prevalence and cigarette consumption in 187 countries, 1980-2012.
JAMA. 2014 Jan 8;311(2):183-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284692.
9
Compliance with an EMA monitoring protocol and its relationship with participant and smoking characteristics.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 May;16 Suppl 2:S88-92. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntt142. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
10
Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence.
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e89-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验