Suppr超能文献

美国癌症联合委员会第八版分期系统在接受肝细胞癌肝切除术患者中的验证:一项基于美国人群的研究。

Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition staging system in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a US population-based study.

作者信息

Zhang Guoqing, Li Renfeng, Zhao Xiaoyang, Meng Songfeng, Ye Jianwen, Zhao Longshuan

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

Department of Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

J Surg Res. 2018 Feb;222:55-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.09.044. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) eighth edition staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has incorporated several significant changes. This study aims to evaluate the newly proposed staging system and assess its strengths and weaknesses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified patients with pathologically confirmed stage I-III HCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014.

RESULTS

After all exclusion criteria were applied, AJCC seventh and eighth edition staging was possible in 4931 patients. According to the AJCC eighth edition staging system, stages IB and II did not differ significantly in terms of overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) (P = 0.928 and 0.872, respectively). On the basis of the above results, we reclassified T1a, T1b, and T2 into several subgroups. According to the modified AJCC eighth edition staging system, OS and CSS among the five groups of patients differed significantly. For OS predication, the Akaike information criterion values for the AJCC seventh, eighth, and modified eighth edition staging systems were 29,288.24, 29,282.85, and 27,182.21, respectively, and the c-indices for the AJCC seventh, eighth, and modified eighth edition staging systems were 0.5716, 0.5805, and 0.6082, respectively. Regarding CSS, the Akaike information criterion values for the AJCC seventh, eighth, and modified eighth edition staging systems were 21,701.11, 21,682.12, and 20,313.26, respectively, and the c-indices for the AJCC seventh, eighth, and modified eighth edition staging systems were 0.5983, 0.6117, and 0.6436, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first large-scale validation of the AJCC eighth edition staging system for patients undergoing hepatectomy. Our study revealed that there was a lack of discrepancy in the outcomes for stage IB and II tumors for AJCC eighth edition staging system of HCC. Our modified AJCC eighth edition staging system allows for finer stratification of patients undergoing hepatectomy according to more detailed tumor size and vascular invasion classifications.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第八版肝细胞癌(HCC)分期系统纳入了多项重大改变。本研究旨在评估新提出的分期系统,并评估其优缺点。

材料与方法

利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,我们确定了2004年至2014年间病理确诊为I - III期HCC的患者。

结果

应用所有排除标准后,4931例患者可进行AJCC第七版和第八版分期。根据AJCC第八版分期系统,IB期和II期在总生存期(OS)和病因特异性生存期(CSS)方面无显著差异(P分别为0.928和0.872)。基于上述结果,我们将T1a、T1b和T2重新分类为几个亚组。根据改良的AJCC第八版分期系统,五组患者的OS和CSS有显著差异。对于OS预测,AJCC第七版、第八版和改良第八版分期系统的赤池信息准则值分别为29288.24、29282.85和27182.21,AJCC第七版、第八版和改良第八版分期系统的c指数分别为0.5716、0.5805和0.6082。关于CSS,AJCC第七版、第八版和改良第八版分期系统的赤池信息准则值分别为21701.11、21682.12和20313.26,AJCC第七版、第八版和改良第八版分期系统的c指数分别为0.5983、0.6117和0.6436。

结论

这是对接受肝切除术患者的AJCC第八版分期系统的首次大规模验证。我们的研究表明,HCC的AJCC第八版分期系统中,IB期和II期肿瘤的预后缺乏差异。我们改良的AJCC第八版分期系统能够根据更详细的肿瘤大小和血管侵犯分类,对接受肝切除术的患者进行更精细的分层。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验