• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断第二原发癌的途径:一项混合方法系统评价的方案。

Pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.

机构信息

Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Scottish Cancer Registry, Information Services Division, NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e017929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017929.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017929
PMID:29273656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5988126/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

As cancer survivors continue to live longer, the incidence of second primary cancers (SPCs) will also rise. Relatively little is understood about the diagnostic pathway for SPCs, how people appraise, interpret symptoms and seek help for a second different cancer and the experiences (including challenges) of healthcare providers relating to SPCs. This study aims to systematically appraise and synthesise the literature on the pathways to diagnosis of an SPC and the associated patient and healthcare provider experiences.

METHODS

The approach taken includes systematic searches of published and unpublished literature without any date or language restrictions. MEDLINE, Embase, CAB Abstracts, MEDLINE In-Process and non-indexed citations, PsycINFO, Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and other non-indexed citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, CINAHL, ASSIA, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, PROSPERO and grey literature will be searched to identify observational, systematic reviews, mixed methods and qualitative studies of interest. Titles, abstracts and full texts will be screened against the inclusion-exclusion criteria by at least two reviewers independently. Relevant outcomes of interest and study and population characteristics will be extracted. Synthesis will be used guided by the Pathways to Treatment model and the Olesen model of time intervals.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required. This systematic review will provide a deeper understanding of the complex and heterogeneous diagnostic pathways of SPCs, while identifying common themes across the diagnostic interval, routes to diagnosis and patient and healthcare provider experiences. These findings will help provide a nuanced picture of the diagnostic pathway for SPCs that may inform policy and consistent practice. In particular, approaches to early diagnosis for an SPC; including the timing and reasons behind the decision by the patient to seek care,the challenges faced by healthcare providers, and in the development of future interventions to reduce the delay in patient time-to-presentation.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42016051692.

摘要

简介

随着癌症幸存者寿命的延长,第二原发癌(SPC)的发病率也将上升。对于 SPC 的诊断途径、人们如何评估、解释症状以及寻求第二种不同癌症的帮助以及与 SPC 相关的医疗保健提供者的经验(包括挑战),相对了解甚少。本研究旨在系统地评估和综合 SPC 诊断途径以及相关患者和医疗保健提供者经验的文献。

方法

所采用的方法包括对已发表和未发表的文献进行系统搜索,不限制日期或语言。将搜索 MEDLINE、Embase、CAB 摘要、MEDLINE 正在处理中和非索引引文、PsycINFO、Epub 先行打印、正在处理中和其他非索引引文、Ovid MEDLINE 每日、CINAHL、ASSIA、社会学摘要、Web of Science、PROSPERO 和灰色文献,以确定感兴趣的观察性、系统评价、混合方法和定性研究。至少两名评审员将独立筛选标题、摘要和全文,以符合纳入排除标准。将提取相关结局以及研究和人群特征。综合使用将由治疗途径模型和 Olesen 时间间隔模型指导。

伦理和传播

不需要伦理批准。本系统评价将更深入地了解 SPC 复杂且异质的诊断途径,同时确定诊断间隔、诊断途径和患者及医疗保健提供者经验的共同主题。这些发现将有助于提供 SPC 诊断途径的细致画面,从而为政策和一致的实践提供信息。特别是,针对 SPC 的早期诊断方法;包括患者寻求治疗的决定背后的时间和原因、医疗保健提供者面临的挑战,以及未来减少患者就诊时间延迟的干预措施的发展。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42016051692。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/5988126/42cb2d30b797/bmjopen-2017-017929f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/5988126/14f82eb16eb0/bmjopen-2017-017929f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/5988126/42cb2d30b797/bmjopen-2017-017929f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/5988126/14f82eb16eb0/bmjopen-2017-017929f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c3d6/5988126/42cb2d30b797/bmjopen-2017-017929f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Pathways to diagnosis of a second primary cancer: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review.诊断第二原发癌的途径:一项混合方法系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 21;7(12):e017929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017929.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
5
Non-familial intergenerational interventions and their impact on social and mental wellbeing of both younger and older people-A mapping review and evidence and gap map.非家庭代际干预及其对年轻人和老年人社会与心理健康的影响——一项映射综述以及证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 16;19(1):e1306. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1306. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Interventions by healthcare professionals to improve management of physical long-term conditions in adults who are homeless: a systematic review protocol.卫生保健专业人员干预措施,以改善无家可归的成年人身体长期疾病的管理:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e016756. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016756.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the implementation, management, use and optimisation of electronic prescribing systems in hospital settings: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.医院环境中电子处方系统实施、管理、使用及优化的认知与经验:定性研究的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 8;6(7):e011858. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011858.
8
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
9
Real-world ethics in palliative care: protocol for a systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice.真实世界中的姑息治疗伦理学:一项系统综述的研究方案,旨在评估在临床实践中,专科姑息治疗医生报告的伦理挑战。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 27;9(5):e028480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028480.
10
Clinical ethics support services in paediatric practice: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review on structures, interventions and outcomes.儿科实践中的临床伦理支持服务:一项关于结构、干预和结果的混合研究系统评价的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 8;12(4):e057867. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057867.

引用本文的文献

1
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Apr;67(4):e99-e103. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6704e99.
2
Cancer diagnosis in primary care: Six steps to reducing the diagnostic interval.基层医疗中的癌症诊断:缩短诊断间隔的六个步骤。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Apr;67(4):265-268. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6704265.
3
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for synchronous cancer of the anal canal and cervix.调强放射治疗同步肛管癌和宫颈癌

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer-specific variation in emergency presentation by sex, age and deprivation across 27 common and rarer cancers.27种常见和罕见癌症在按性别、年龄和贫困程度划分的紧急就诊情况中的癌症特异性差异。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 31;112 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S129-36. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.52.
2
Trends in the lifetime risk of developing cancer in Great Britain: comparison of risk for those born from 1930 to 1960.英国患癌终生风险的趋势:1930年至1960年出生人群的风险比较。
Br J Cancer. 2015 Mar 3;112(5):943-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.606. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
Oncol Lett. 2018 Oct;16(4):4512-4518. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9229. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
Risk of second cancers cancer after a first primary breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.首次原发性乳腺癌后第二癌症(继发性癌症)的风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Jan;136(1):158-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.10.029. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
5
Incidence of multiple primary cancers and interval between first and second primary cancers.多原发癌的发生率及首次与第二原发癌之间的间隔时间。
Cancer Sci. 2014 Jul;105(7):890-6. doi: 10.1111/cas.12433. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
6
Second primary cancer risk - the impact of applying different definitions of multiple primaries: results from a retrospective population-based cancer registry study.第二原发性癌症风险——应用多种原发性癌症不同定义的影响:一项基于人群的回顾性癌症登记研究结果
BMC Cancer. 2014 Apr 18;14:272. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-272.
7
Solid tumor second primary neoplasms: who is at risk, what can we do?实体瘤第二原发性肿瘤:谁有风险,我们能做什么?
Semin Oncol. 2013 Dec;40(6):676-89. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.09.012.
8
The impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a review.合并症对癌症生存的影响:综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Nov 1;5(Suppl 1):3-29. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S47150.
9
Anatomic subsite of primary colorectal cancer and subsequent risk and distribution of second cancers.原发性结直肠癌的解剖部位亚区与随后的第二原发癌的风险和分布。
Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;119(17):3140-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28076. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
10
Second malignant neoplasms: assessment and strategies for risk reduction.第二恶性肿瘤:评估与降低风险策略。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 20;30(30):3734-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8681. Epub 2012 Sep 24.