Suppr超能文献

五天的成对联合刺激治疗未能改善脑卒中患者的运动功能。

Five-day course of paired associative stimulation fails to improve motor function in stroke patients.

机构信息

Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), university of Toulouse Paul-Sabatier, INSERM, 31024 Toulouse, France.

Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC), university of Toulouse Paul-Sabatier, INSERM, 31024 Toulouse, France.

出版信息

Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Mar;61(2):78-84. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive brain stimulation has been studied as a therapeutic adjunct for upper-limb recovery in patients with stroke. One type of stimulation, paired associative stimulation (PAS), has effects on plasticity in both patients and healthy participants. Lasting several hours, these effects are reversible and topographically specific.

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to investigate the presence of a lasting increase in motor cortex plasticity for extensor wrist muscles - extensor carpi radialis (ECR) - and an improvement in upper-limb function after 5 days of daily PAS in patients at the subacute post-stroke stage.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients (mean [SD] age 50.1 [12.1] years, weeks since stroke 10.1 [5.3]) were included in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and randomly assigned to the PAS or sham group (n=13 and n=11). For the PAS group, patients underwent a 5-day course of electrical peripheral stimulation combined with magnetic cortical stimulation applied to the ECR muscle in a single daily session at 0.1Hz for 30min; patients with sham treatment received minimal cortical stimulation. Both patient groups underwent 2 hr of conventional physiotherapy. Variations in the motor evoked potential (MEP) surface area of the ECR muscle and Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper-Limb motor scores were analysed up to day 12.

RESULTS

The 2 groups did not differ in electrophysiological or motor parameters. Repeated PAS sessions seemed to affect only patients with low initial cortical excitability. We found considerable variability in PAS effects between patients and across the sessions.

CONCLUSION

We failed to induce a lasting effect with PAS in the present study. PAS does not seem to be the main method for post-stroke brain stimulation. Perhaps recruitment of patients could be more selective, possibly targeting those with a wide altered ipsilesional corticomotor pathway.

摘要

背景

非侵入性脑刺激已被研究作为中风患者上肢恢复的辅助治疗方法。一种刺激类型,即配对联想刺激(PAS),对患者和健康参与者的可塑性都有影响。这种影响持续数小时,是可逆的且具有特定的拓扑结构。

目的

本研究旨在探讨在亚急性期脑卒中后阶段,每天进行 PAS 治疗 5 天后,伸腕肌(桡侧伸腕肌)运动皮层可塑性是否会持续增加,以及上肢功能是否会改善。

方法

共有 24 名患者(平均[标准差]年龄 50.1[12.1]岁,中风后周数 10.1[5.3]周)参与了这项双盲、安慰剂对照试验,并随机分配到 PAS 组(n=13)和假刺激组(n=11)。对于 PAS 组,患者接受了为期 5 天的电外周刺激联合磁皮质刺激,每天一次,刺激频率为 0.1Hz,持续 30 分钟;接受假刺激治疗的患者仅接受最小的皮质刺激。两组患者均接受 2 小时常规物理治疗。分析了桡侧伸腕肌运动诱发电位(MEP)表面面积和 Fugl-Meyer 上肢运动评分的变化,直至第 12 天。

结果

两组患者在电生理和运动参数方面无差异。重复的 PAS 治疗似乎仅影响初始皮质兴奋性较低的患者。我们发现 PAS 效应在患者之间和治疗过程中存在很大的变异性。

结论

在本研究中,我们未能诱导 PAS 产生持久效应。PAS 似乎不是脑卒中后大脑刺激的主要方法。也许患者的招募可以更具选择性,可能针对那些对侧皮质运动通路改变较大的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验