Picardi Michela, Guidali Giacomo, Caronni Antonio, Rota Viviana, Corbo Massimo, Bolognini Nadia
Department of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Italy.
PhD Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 1;15(1):15313. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-98595-8.
We assess the effectiveness of a visuomotor paired associative stimulation (vm-PAS) protocol targeting the Action Observation Network (AON) in chronic post-stroke patients with upper-limb mild hemiparesis. Vm-PAS consisted of hand-grasping action observation stimuli repeatedly paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1). Fifteen post-stroke patients underwent a session of the vm-PAS and, as a control, of the standard excitatory PAS (M1-PAS), during which slow-rate electrical stimulation of the paretic limb was paired with M1-TMS. Before and after each PAS, we assessed corticospinal excitability (CSE), short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and paretic wrist's voluntary movements. The two protocols induce distinct muscle-specific CSE enhancements: vm-PAS increases motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) recorded from the paretic first dorsal interosseous muscle. Conversely, M1-PAS increases MEPs recorded from the electrically stimulated extensor carpi radialis muscle. Vm-PAS efficacy correlates with hemiparesis chronicity: the higher the time elapsed since the stroke, the greater vm-PAS effects on CSE. Neither protocol affected SICI or wrist movements. Our results suggest that vm-PAS leads to muscle-specific enhancements of CSE in post-stroke patients, highlighting its potential for modulating M1 excitability after stroke. These findings show the efficacy of a cross-modal PAS protocol targeting the AON in an injured motor system.
我们评估了一种针对慢性中风后上肢轻度偏瘫患者的动作观察网络(AON)的视觉运动配对联想刺激(vm-PAS)方案的有效性。Vm-PAS包括反复将手部抓握动作观察刺激与经颅磁刺激(TMS)脉冲配对,施加于患侧初级运动皮层(M1)。15名中风后患者接受了一次vm-PAS治疗,并作为对照接受了标准兴奋性PAS(M1-PAS)治疗,在此期间,对患侧肢体进行慢速电刺激并与M1-TMS配对。在每次PAS治疗前后,我们评估了皮质脊髓兴奋性(CSE)、短间隔皮质内抑制(SICI)以及患侧手腕的自主运动。这两种方案诱导出不同的肌肉特异性CSE增强:vm-PAS增加了从患侧第一背侧骨间肌记录到的运动诱发电位(MEP)。相反,M1-PAS增加了从电刺激的桡侧腕伸肌记录到的MEP。Vm-PAS的疗效与偏瘫的慢性程度相关:中风后经过的时间越长,vm-PAS对CSE的影响就越大。两种方案均未影响SICI或手腕运动。我们的结果表明,vm-PAS可导致中风后患者CSE的肌肉特异性增强,突出了其在中风后调节M1兴奋性的潜力。这些发现表明了一种针对受伤运动系统中AON的跨模态PAS方案的有效性。