• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同类型 1 型、2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者的死亡原因。

Different Causes of Death in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Type 1, Type 2, and Myocardial Injury.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense, Denmark.

Department of Nuclear Medicine, OUH, Centre of Health Economics Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.043. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.043
PMID:29274756
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Data outlining the mortality and the causes of death in patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, type 2 myocardial infarction, and those with myocardial injury are limited.

METHODS

During a 1-year period from January 2010 to January 2011, all hospitalized patients who had cardiac troponin I measured on clinical indication were prospectively studied. Patients with at least one cardiac troponin I value >30 ng/L underwent case ascertainment and individual evaluation by an experienced adjudication committee. Patients were classified as having type 1 myocardial infarction, type 2 myocardial infarction, or myocardial injury according to the criteria of the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Follow-up was ensured until December 31, 2014. Data on mortality and causes of death were obtained from the Danish Civil Registration System and the Danish Register of Causes of Death.

RESULTS

Overall, 3762 consecutive patients were followed for a mean of 3.2 years (interquartile range 1.3-3.6 years). All-cause mortality differed significantly among categories: Type 1 myocardial infarction 31.7%, type 2 myocardial infarction 62.2%, myocardial injury 58.7%, and 22.2% in patients with nonelevated troponin values (log-rank test; P < .0001). In patients with type 1 myocardial infarction, 61.3% died from cardiovascular causes, vs 42.6% in patients with type 2 myocardial infarction (P = .015) and 41.2% in those with myocardial injury (P < .0001). The overall mortality and the causes of death did not differ substantially between patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and those with myocardial injury.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury exhibit a significantly higher long-term mortality compared with patients with type 1 myocardial infarction . However, most patients with type 1 myocardial infarction die from cardiovascular causes in contrast to patients with type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury, in whom noncardiovascular causes of death predominate.

摘要

背景

关于 1 型心肌梗死、2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者的死亡率和死因的数据有限。

方法

在 2010 年 1 月至 2011 年 1 月的 1 年期间,对所有因临床指征检测心肌肌钙蛋白 I 的住院患者进行了前瞻性研究。至少有 1 次心肌肌钙蛋白 I 值>30ng/L 的患者进行病例确定,并由经验丰富的裁决委员会进行个体评估。根据心肌梗死的通用定义标准,将患者分为 1 型心肌梗死、2 型心肌梗死或心肌损伤。随访至 2014 年 12 月 31 日。死亡率和死因数据来自丹麦民事登记系统和丹麦死因登记处。

结果

共有 3762 例连续患者接受了平均 3.2 年(四分位距 1.3-3.6 年)的随访。全因死亡率在不同类别之间差异显著:1 型心肌梗死 31.7%,2 型心肌梗死 62.2%,心肌损伤 58.7%,无升高肌钙蛋白值的患者为 22.2%(对数秩检验;P<0.0001)。在 1 型心肌梗死患者中,61.3%死于心血管原因,而 2 型心肌梗死患者为 42.6%(P=0.015),心肌损伤患者为 41.2%(P<0.0001)。2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者的总体死亡率和死因无显著差异。

结论

与 1 型心肌梗死患者相比,2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者的长期死亡率显著升高。然而,与 2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者相比,大多数 1 型心肌梗死患者死于心血管原因,而非心血管原因是这些患者死亡的主要原因。

相似文献

1
Different Causes of Death in Patients with Myocardial Infarction Type 1, Type 2, and Myocardial Injury.不同类型 1 型、2 型心肌梗死和心肌损伤患者的死亡原因。
Am J Med. 2018 May;131(5):548-554. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.11.043. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients with Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Injury, and Nonelevated Troponins.心肌梗死、心肌损伤且肌钙蛋白未升高患者的临床特征及预后
Am J Med. 2016 Apr;129(4):446.e5-446.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
3
Diagnosis of unstable angina pectoris has declined markedly with the advent of more sensitive troponin assays.随着更敏感的肌钙蛋白检测方法的出现,不稳定型心绞痛的诊断明显减少。
Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.044. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
4
Type 1 and 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury: Clinical Transition to High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin I.1型和2型心肌梗死及心肌损伤:向高敏心肌肌钙蛋白I的临床转变
Am J Med. 2017 Dec;130(12):1431-1439.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.049. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
5
Prognostic Impact of Myocardial Injury Related to Various Cardiac and Noncardiac Conditions.与各种心脏和非心脏疾病相关的心肌损伤的预后影响。
Am J Med. 2016 May;129(5):506-514.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery and its association with short-term mortality.非心脏手术后的心肌损伤及其与短期死亡率的关系。
Circulation. 2013 Jun 11;127(23):2264-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002128. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction.2型心肌梗死和心肌损伤与1型心肌梗死相比的治疗及预后
Coron Artery Dis. 2018 Jan;29(1):46-52. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000545.
8
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Myocardial Injury.2 型心肌梗死伴心肌损伤患者的长期结局。
Circulation. 2018 Mar 20;137(12):1236-1245. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031806. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
9
Incidence, Frequency, and Clinical Characteristics of Type 3 Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice.临床实践中 3 型心肌梗死的发生率、频率和临床特征。
Am J Med. 2017 Jul;130(7):862.e9-862.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.12.034. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction.高敏心肌肌钙蛋白与心肌梗死的通用定义。
Circulation. 2020 Jan 21;141(3):161-171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042960. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Myocardial Infarction on Cerebral Homeostasis: Exploring the Protective Role of Estrogen.心肌梗死对脑内环境稳定的影响:探索雌激素的保护作用。
J Cardiovasc Aging. 2025 Jun;5(2). doi: 10.20517/jca.2025.02. Epub 2025 Jun 29.
2
Implications of a new clinical classification of acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死新临床分类的意义
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Mar 22;14(3):131-141. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf002.
3
Developing a Computational Phenotype of the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction for Inpatients.
为住院患者开发心肌梗死第四次通用定义的计算表型。
J Clin Med. 2024 Dec 19;13(24):7773. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247773.
4
Causes of death and trends in mortality from the year 2000 to 2017 in patients with acute myocardial infarction.2000 年至 2017 年急性心肌梗死患者的死因及死亡率趋势。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2424449. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2424449. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
5
Contrasting the potential benefits of early invasive coronary angiography in acute and chronic myocardial injury patterns.比较急性和慢性心肌损伤模式下早期有创冠状动脉造影的潜在获益。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 15;18(6):e0286157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286157. eCollection 2023.
6
Potential Biomarkers to Distinguish Type 1 Myocardial Infarction in Troponin-Elevated Diseases.鉴别肌钙蛋白升高疾病中 1 型心肌梗死的潜在生物标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 30;24(9):8097. doi: 10.3390/ijms24098097.
7
Type 2 Myocardial Infarction and Long-Term Mortality Risk Factors: A Retrospective Cohort Study.2型心肌梗死与长期死亡风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2471-2480. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02485-2. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
8
Risk factor associations with individual myocardial infarction subtypes and acute non-ischemic myocardial injury in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA): Design and rationale.风险因素与动脉粥样硬化多民族研究(MESA)中个体心肌梗死亚型和急性非缺血性心肌损伤的相关性:设计与原理。
Am Heart J. 2023 Jun;260:151-173. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.02.012. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
9
Improving Risk Stratification for Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction.改善 2 型心肌梗死患者的风险分层。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jan 17;81(2):156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.025.
10
Assessment of Oxygen Supply-Demand Imbalance and Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: A Secondary Analysis of the High-STEACS Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.2 型心肌梗死患者的氧供需失衡评估及结局:高 STEACS 聚类随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2220162. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.20162.