• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Practice Innovations Decision Model.一种实践创新决策模型。
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 15;4:2333392817745773. doi: 10.1177/2333392817745773. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Evaluation of rapeseed varieties using novel integrated fuzzy PIPRECIA - Fuzzy MABAC model.利用新型综合模糊 PIPRECIA-模糊 MABAC 模型评估油菜品种。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 25;16(2):e0246857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246857. eCollection 2021.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.人类健康与环境风险的风险管理框架。
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. doi: 10.1080/10937400390208608.
6
Linear Programming and Fuzzy Optimization to Substantiate Investment Decisions in Tangible Assets.用于证实有形资产投资决策的线性规划与模糊优化
Entropy (Basel). 2020 Jan 19;22(1):121. doi: 10.3390/e22010121.
7
Implementation of the new easy approach to fuzzy multi-criteria decision aid in the field of management.新的模糊多准则决策辅助简易方法在管理领域的实施。
MethodsX. 2021 Apr 13;8:101344. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101344. eCollection 2021.
8
Using fuzzy-trace theory to understand and improve health judgments, decisions, and behaviors: A literature review.运用模糊痕迹理论理解和改善健康判断、决策及行为:一项文献综述。
Health Psychol. 2016 Aug;35(8):781-792. doi: 10.1037/hea0000384.
9
Framework to Support the Process of Decision-Making on Life-Sustaining Treatments in the ICU: Results of a Delphi Study.支持 ICU 中生命维持治疗决策过程的框架:德尔菲研究的结果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 May;48(5):645-653. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004221.
10
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple criteria decision analysis for health technology assessment.健康技术评估的多准则决策分析。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1172-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015. Epub 2012 Oct 6.
2
Impact of retail medicine on standard costs in primary care: a semiparametric analysis.零售医疗对初级保健标准成本的影响:半参数分析。
Popul Health Manag. 2009 Dec;12(6):333-5. doi: 10.1089/pop.2009.0007.
3
Patient satisfaction with retail health clinic care.患者对零售医疗诊所护理的满意度。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2009 Oct;21(10):565-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2009.00447.x.
4
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses.比较零售诊所与其他医疗场所针对3种常见疾病的护理成本和质量。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 1;151(5):321-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00006.
5
The emergence of retail-based clinics in the United States: early observations.美国零售诊所的出现:早期观察。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1293-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1293.
6
Use and costs of care in retail clinics versus traditional care sites.零售诊所与传统就诊点的医疗服务使用情况和费用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1283-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1283.
7
Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients' visits.零售诊所、初级保健医生和急诊部:患者就诊比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct;27(5):1272-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1272.
8
Do retail clinics increase early return visits for pediatric patients?零售诊所会增加儿科患者的早期复诊率吗?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):475-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.080072.

一种实践创新决策模型。

A Practice Innovations Decision Model.

作者信息

Rohrer James E

机构信息

Program in Public Health, Department of Health Sciences, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 15;4:2333392817745773. doi: 10.1177/2333392817745773. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/2333392817745773
PMID:29276728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5734430/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this commentary is to propose a flexible practice innovations decision model (PIDM) for use in health services planning and management.

METHOD

This is an example of fuzzy decision analysis. The elements of the model are explained by applying it to the decision of whether to open a primary care clinic in retail space. The model contains 10 criteria, each of which scored as 1 (met) or 0 (not met). The scores are summed to guide the decision.

RESULT

In this example, success was defined a priori as meeting 8 or more criteria. Sensitivity analysis and simulation can be used in practice to test the model.

CONCLUSION

The PIDM appears to be applicable to a variety of decisions, and the fuzzy scoring combined with simulation and sensitivity analysis generates plausible results. The model should be modified as necessary for each situation in which it is applied.

摘要

目的

本评论的目的是提出一种灵活的实践创新决策模型(PIDM),用于卫生服务规划和管理。

方法

这是模糊决策分析的一个示例。通过将该模型应用于是否在零售空间开设初级保健诊所的决策来解释模型的要素。该模型包含10个标准,每个标准的得分是1(满足)或0(未满足)。将分数相加以指导决策。

结果

在这个例子中,成功被预先定义为满足8个或更多标准。敏感性分析和模拟可在实践中用于测试该模型。

结论

PIDM似乎适用于各种决策,并且模糊评分与模拟和敏感性分析相结合产生了合理的结果。该模型应根据其应用的每种情况进行必要的修改。