Moss Jason M, Bryan William E, Wilkerson Loren M, King Heather A, Jackson George L, Owenby Ryan K, Van Houtven Courtney H, Stevens Melissa B, Powers James, Vaughan Camille P, Hung William W, Hwang Ula, Markland Alayne D, Sloane Richard, Knaack William, Hastings Susan Nicole
1 Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
2 Campbell University College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Buies Creek, NC, USA.
J Pharm Pract. 2019 Apr;32(2):167-174. doi: 10.1177/0897190017747424. Epub 2017 Dec 25.
To evaluate the impact of an academic detailing intervention delivered as part of a quality improvement project by a physician-pharmacist pair on (1) self-reported confidence in prescribing for older adults and (2) rates of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prescribed to older adults by physician residents in a Veteran Affairs emergency department (ED).
This quality improvement project at a single site utilized a questionnaire that assessed knowledge of Beers Criteria, self-perceived barriers to appropriate prescribing in older adults, and self-rated confidence in ability to prescribe in older adults which was administered to physician residents before and after academic detailing delivered during their emergency medicine rotation. PIM rates in the resident cohort who received the academic detailing were compared to residents who did not receive the intervention.
Sixty-three residents received the intervention between February 2013 and December 2014. At baseline, approximately 50% of the residents surveyed reported never hearing about nor using the Beers Criteria. A significantly greater proportion of residents agreed or strongly agreed in their abilities to identify drug-disease interactions and to prescribe the appropriate medication for the older adult after receiving the intervention. The resident cohort who received the educational intervention was less likely to prescribe a PIM when compared to the untrained resident cohort with a rate ratio of 0.73 ( P < .0001).
Academic detailing led by a physician-pharmacist pair resulted in improved confidence in physician residents' ability to prescribe safely in an older adult ED population and was associated with a statistically significant decrease in PIM rates.
评估由医生 - 药师团队作为质量改进项目的一部分实施的学术性循证推广干预措施对以下两方面的影响:(1)自我报告的为老年人开处方的信心;(2)退伍军人事务部急诊科医生实习生为老年人开具潜在不适当药物(PIM)的比例。
在单一地点开展的这项质量改进项目使用了一份问卷,该问卷评估了对《Beers标准》的了解、认为在为老年人合理开处方方面存在的自身障碍以及自我评定的为老年人开处方能力的信心,在医生实习生进行急诊医学轮转期间接受学术性循证推广干预之前和之后对他们进行问卷调查。将接受学术性循证推广干预的实习生队列中的PIM比例与未接受干预的实习生进行比较。
2013年2月至2014年12月期间,63名实习生接受了干预。在基线时,约50%接受调查的实习生表示从未听说过也未使用过《Beers标准》。在接受干预后,明显更大比例的实习生同意或强烈同意他们有能力识别药物 - 疾病相互作用并为老年人开出适当的药物。与未接受培训的实习生队列相比,接受教育干预的实习生队列开具PIM的可能性较小,率比为0.73(P < .0001)。
由医生 - 药师团队主导的学术性循证推广提高了医生实习生在老年急诊科人群中安全开处方的信心,并且与PIM比例在统计学上的显著降低相关。