Canning Patricia
University College Roosevelt, Netherlands.
Lang Lit (Harlow). 2017 May;26(2):172-187. doi: 10.1177/0963947017704731. Epub 2017 May 21.
Cognitive stylistics offers a range of frameworks for understanding (amongst other things) what producers of literary texts 'do' with language and how they 'do' it. Less prevalent, however, is an understanding of the ways in which these same frameworks offer insights into what 'do' (and how they 'do' it). Text World Theory (Werth, 1999; Gavins, 2007; Whiteley, 2011) has proved useful for understanding how and why readers construct mental representations engendered by the act of reading. However, research on readers' responses to literature has largely focused on an 'idealised' reader or an 'experimental' subject-reader often derived from within the academy and conducted using contrived or amended literary fiction. Moreover, the format of traditional book groups (participants read texts privately and discuss them at a later date) as well as online community forums such as Goodreads, means that such studies derive data from post-hoc, rather than real-time textual encounters and discussions. The current study is the first of its kind in analysing real-time reading contexts with real readers during a researcher-led literary project ('read.live.learn') in Northern Ireland's only female prison. In doing so, the study is unique in addressing experimental and post hoc bias. Using Text World Theory, the paper considers the personal and social of reader engagement in the talk of the participants. As such, it has three interrelated aims: to argue for the social and personal benefits of reading stylistically rich literature in real-time reading groups; to demonstrate the efficacy of stylistics for understanding how those benefits come about, and to demonstrate the inter-disciplinary value of stylistics, particularly its potential for traversing traditional research parameters.
认知文体学提供了一系列框架,用于理解(以及其他方面)文学文本创作者如何运用语言以及他们是如何做到的。然而,对于这些相同的框架如何为理解读者如何阅读(以及他们是如何阅读的)提供见解,人们的了解却较少。文本世界理论(韦思,1999;加文斯,2007;怀特利,2011)已被证明有助于理解读者如何以及为何构建由阅读行为产生的心理表征。然而,关于读者对文学作品反应的研究主要集中在一个“理想化”的读者或一个“实验性”的主体读者身上,这类读者通常来自学术界,且研究是使用人为编造或修改过的文学小说进行的。此外,传统读书小组的形式(参与者私下阅读文本,之后进行讨论)以及在线社区论坛(如Goodreads)意味着这类研究的数据来自事后分析,而非实时的文本接触和讨论。当前的研究是首例在北爱尔兰唯一的女子监狱中,在一个由研究人员主导的文学项目(“阅读·生活·学习”)中,对真实读者的实时阅读情境进行分析的研究。这样一来,该研究在解决实验性和事后偏差方面具有独特性。本文运用文本世界理论,探讨了参与者讨论中读者参与的个人和社会层面。因此,它有三个相互关联的目标:论证在实时阅读小组中阅读文体丰富的文学作品所带来的社会和个人益处;证明文体学在理解这些益处如何产生方面的有效性;展示文体学的跨学科价值,特别是其跨越传统研究参数的潜力。