• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Wattpad 作为文学研究的资源。数字社会阅读的重要性的定量和定性例子,以及读者在页边空白处的评论。

Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers' comments in the margins.

机构信息

Department of Human Sciences for Education "R. Massa", University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

School of Media, Arts and Science, Sogang University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226708. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0226708
PMID:31940372
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6961871/
Abstract

The end of deep reading is a commonplace in public debates, whenever societies talk about youth, books, and the digital age. In contrast to this, we show for the first time and in detail, how intensively young readers write and comment literary texts at an unprecedented scale. We present several analyses of how fiction is transmitted through the social reading platform Wattpad, one of the largest platforms for user-generated stories, including novels, fanfiction, humour, classics, and poetry. By mixed quantitative and qualitative methods and scalable reading we scrutinise texts and comments on Wattpad, what themes are preferred in 13 languages, what role does genre play for readers behaviour, and what kind of emotional engagement is prevalent when young readers share stories. Our results point out the rise of a global reading culture in youth reading besides national preferences for certain topics and genres, patterns of reading engagement, aesthetic values and social interaction. When reading Teen Fiction social-bonding (affective interaction) is prevalent, when reading Classics social-cognitive interaction (collective intelligence) is prevalent. An educational outcome suggests that readers who engage in Teen Fiction learn to read Classics and to judge books not only in direct emotional response to character's behaviour, but focusing more on contextualised interpretation of the text.

摘要

深度阅读的终结是公共辩论中的老生常谈,每当社会讨论青年、书籍和数字时代时,都会提到这个话题。与此相反,我们首次详细展示了年轻读者在前所未有的规模上如何积极地书写和评论文学文本。我们展示了对通过社交阅读平台 Wattpad 传播小说的几种分析,Wattpad 是最大的用户生成故事平台之一,包括小说、粉丝小说、幽默、经典和诗歌。我们通过混合定量和定性方法以及可扩展的阅读来仔细研究 Wattpad 上的文本和评论,了解 13 种语言中哪些主题更受欢迎,体裁对读者行为有何作用,以及当年轻读者分享故事时,哪种情感参与更为普遍。我们的研究结果表明,除了对某些主题和体裁的国家偏好、阅读参与模式、审美价值观和社会互动之外,青年阅读中还出现了一种全球阅读文化。当阅读青少年小说时,社会联系(情感互动)很普遍,而当阅读经典作品时,社会认知互动(集体智慧)则很普遍。一个教育成果表明,参与青少年小说阅读的读者学会阅读经典作品,并不仅仅根据对角色行为的直接情感反应来评判书籍,而是更注重对文本的情境化解读。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/5f32cb48b5d5/pone.0226708.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/b53a69eb4218/pone.0226708.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/c38786bd21e1/pone.0226708.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/d8bb6f2256f6/pone.0226708.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/959680f33202/pone.0226708.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/8d5bf3de8448/pone.0226708.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/fb923df581d3/pone.0226708.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/d463c650e557/pone.0226708.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/74a88e1d6dd2/pone.0226708.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/3d3ac30259da/pone.0226708.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/2594be2fc5d7/pone.0226708.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/e09e1a1a4c30/pone.0226708.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/518599938ff0/pone.0226708.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/7afda5787960/pone.0226708.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/0250ef80b59d/pone.0226708.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/7b6fa0e8dcd3/pone.0226708.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/5f32cb48b5d5/pone.0226708.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/b53a69eb4218/pone.0226708.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/c38786bd21e1/pone.0226708.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/d8bb6f2256f6/pone.0226708.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/959680f33202/pone.0226708.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/8d5bf3de8448/pone.0226708.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/fb923df581d3/pone.0226708.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/d463c650e557/pone.0226708.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/74a88e1d6dd2/pone.0226708.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/3d3ac30259da/pone.0226708.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/2594be2fc5d7/pone.0226708.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/e09e1a1a4c30/pone.0226708.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/518599938ff0/pone.0226708.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/7afda5787960/pone.0226708.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/0250ef80b59d/pone.0226708.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/7b6fa0e8dcd3/pone.0226708.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/96ee/6961871/5f32cb48b5d5/pone.0226708.g016.jpg

相似文献

1
Wattpad as a resource for literary studies. Quantitative and qualitative examples of the importance of digital social reading and readers' comments in the margins.Wattpad 作为文学研究的资源。数字社会阅读的重要性的定量和定性例子,以及读者在页边空白处的评论。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0226708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226708. eCollection 2020.
2
Murder by the book: using crime fiction as a bibliotherapeutic resource.按书杀人:将犯罪小说用作阅读疗法资源
Med Humanit. 2017 Mar;43(1):62-67. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2016-011069. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Exploring the different cognitive, emotional and imaginative experiences of autistic and non-autistic adult readers when contemplating serious literature as compared to non-fiction.探索自闭症成年读者与非自闭症成年读者在思考严肃文学作品与非虚构作品时不同的认知、情感和想象体验。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 4;14:1001268. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1001268. eCollection 2023.
4
Cognitive engagement in emotional text reading: concurrent recordings of eye movements and head motion.情绪文本阅读中的认知参与:眼动和头部运动的同步记录。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1448-1460. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2019.1574718. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
5
Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison.文本世界理论与现实世界读者:从文学到贝尔法斯特一所监狱里的生活
Lang Lit (Harlow). 2017 May;26(2):172-187. doi: 10.1177/0963947017704731. Epub 2017 May 21.
6
Is badfiction processed differently by the human brain? An electrophysical study on reading experience.劣质小说在人类大脑中的处理方式是否不同?一项关于阅读体验的电生理学研究。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2024 Jan 26;17:1333965. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1333965. eCollection 2023.
7
The Use of "Literary Fiction" to Promote Mentalizing Ability.运用“文学小说”提升心理理论能力。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 4;11(8):e0160254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160254. eCollection 2016.
8
Emotional engagement during literary reception: do men and women differ?文学接受过程中的情感投入:男性和女性是否存在差异?
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(5):856-74. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.751359. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
9
Fluctuation in cognitive engagement during listening and reading of erotica and horror stories.听读色情故事和恐怖故事时认知投入的波动。
Cogn Emot. 2023 Aug-Sep;37(5):874-890. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2023.2215974. Epub 2023 May 31.
10
Readers and their roles: Evidence from readers of contemporary fiction in the Netherlands.读者及其角色:来自荷兰当代小说读者的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201157. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling social readers: novel tools for addressing reception from online book reviews.塑造社交读者:用于研究在线书评接受度的新工具。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Dec 22;8(12):210797. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210797. eCollection 2021 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Fiction reading has a small positive impact on social cognition: A meta-analysis.虚构阅读对社会认知有较小的积极影响:一项元分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Nov;147(11):1713-1727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000395. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
2
Text World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison.文本世界理论与现实世界读者:从文学到贝尔法斯特一所监狱里的生活
Lang Lit (Harlow). 2017 May;26(2):172-187. doi: 10.1177/0963947017704731. Epub 2017 May 21.