Suppr超能文献

基因组扰动揭示了肝内胆管癌中独特的调控网络。

Genomic perturbations reveal distinct regulatory networks in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

机构信息

Biotech Research and Innovation Centre, Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Center for Cancer Research Genomics Core, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.

出版信息

Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):949-963. doi: 10.1002/hep.29764. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a highly heterogeneous malignancy that has eluded effective patient stratification to date. The extent to which such heterogeneity can be influenced by individual driver mutations remains to be evaluated. Here, we analyzed genomic (whole-exome sequencing, targeted exome sequencing) and epigenomic data from 496 patients and used the three most recurrently mutated genes to stratify patients (IDH, KRAS, TP53, "undetermined"). Using this molecular dissection approach, each subgroup was determined to possess unique mutational signature preferences, comutation profiles, and enriched pathways. High-throughput drug repositioning in seven patient-matched cell lines, chosen to reflect the genetic alterations specific for each patient group, confirmed in silico predictions of subgroup-specific vulnerabilities linked to enriched pathways. Intriguingly, patients lacking all three mutations ("undetermined") harbored the most extensive structural alterations, while isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant tumors displayed the most extensive DNA methylome dysregulation, consistent with previous findings.

CONCLUSION

Stratification of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients based on occurrence of mutations in three classifier genes (IDH, KRAS, TP53) revealed unique oncogenic programs (mutational, structural, epimutational) that influence pharmacologic response in drug repositioning protocols; this genome dissection approach highlights the potential of individual mutations to induce extensive molecular heterogeneity and could facilitate advancement of therapeutic response in this dismal disease. (Hepatology 2018).

摘要

未加标签

肝内胆管癌仍然是一种高度异质性的恶性肿瘤,迄今为止,仍未能有效地对患者进行分层。这种异质性在多大程度上可以受到个体驱动突变的影响,还有待评估。在这里,我们分析了 496 名患者的基因组(全外显子组测序、靶向外显子组测序)和表观基因组数据,并使用最常突变的三个基因对患者进行分层(IDH、KRAS、TP53、“未确定”)。使用这种分子剖析方法,每个亚组被确定具有独特的突变特征偏好、共突变谱和富集途径。在七个患者匹配的细胞系中进行高通量药物重定位,这些细胞系的选择反映了每个患者组特有的遗传改变,证实了与富集途径相关的亚组特异性脆弱性的计算机预测。有趣的是,缺乏所有三种突变的患者(“未确定”)具有最广泛的结构改变,而异柠檬酸脱氢酶突变肿瘤显示出最广泛的 DNA 甲基组失调,这与先前的发现一致。

结论

基于三个分类基因(IDH、KRAS、TP53)的突变在肝内胆管癌患者中的分层揭示了独特的致癌程序(突变、结构、表观遗传),这些程序影响药物重定位方案中的药物反应;这种基因组剖析方法突出了个体突变诱导广泛分子异质性的潜力,并可能有助于推进这种恶性疾病的治疗反应。(《肝脏病学》2018 年)。

相似文献

1
Genomic perturbations reveal distinct regulatory networks in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Hepatology. 2018 Sep;68(3):949-963. doi: 10.1002/hep.29764. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
2
Genetic Determinants of Outcome in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Hepatology. 2021 Sep;74(3):1429-1444. doi: 10.1002/hep.31829.
3
The landscape of targeted therapies for cholangiocarcinoma: current status and emerging targets.
Oncotarget. 2016 Jul 19;7(29):46750-46767. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8775.
4
Mutational spectrum and precision oncology for biliary tract carcinoma.
Theranostics. 2021 Mar 4;11(10):4585-4598. doi: 10.7150/thno.56539. eCollection 2021.
6
Mutational landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Nat Commun. 2014 Dec 15;5:5696. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6696.
7
Comprehensive Molecular Profiling of Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: Potential Targets for Intervention.
Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Sep 1;24(17):4154-4161. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0078. Epub 2018 May 30.
9
Patterns of gene mutations in bile duct cancers: is it time to overcome the anatomical classification?
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Dec;21(12):1648-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 20.

引用本文的文献

2
A novel mouse model of diverse tumors derived from epithelial cells.
Physiol Rep. 2025 Apr;13(7):e70289. doi: 10.14814/phy2.70289.
3
Mapping the landscape of biliary tract cancer in Europe: challenges and controversies.
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Feb 19;50:101171. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101171. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Genetic, Epigenetic, and Microenvironmental Drivers of Cholangiocarcinoma.
Am J Pathol. 2025 Mar;195(3):362-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2024.10.013. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
7
Mutational spectrum for guiding the decision of adjuvant treatment in patients with resected biliary tract carcinoma.
Cancer Med. 2023 Aug;12(15):16076-16086. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6261. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
8
Mutant IDH in Gliomas: Role in Cancer and Treatment Options.
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 23;15(11):2883. doi: 10.3390/cancers15112883.
10
Are FGFR and IDH1-2 alterations a positive prognostic factor in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? An unresolved issue.
Front Oncol. 2023 Apr 24;13:1137510. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1137510. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Integrated Genomic Characterization of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
Cancer Cell. 2017 Aug 14;32(2):185-203.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.07.007.
3
Whole-Genome and Epigenomic Landscapes of Etiologically Distinct Subtypes of Cholangiocarcinoma.
Cancer Discov. 2017 Oct;7(10):1116-1135. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0368. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Common Molecular Subtypes Among Asian Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma.
Cancer Cell. 2017 Jul 10;32(1):57-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Comprehensive and Integrative Genomic Characterization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Cell. 2017 Jun 15;169(7):1327-1341.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046.
6
Integrative Genomic Analysis of Cholangiocarcinoma Identifies Distinct IDH-Mutant Molecular Profiles.
Cell Rep. 2017 Mar 14;18(11):2780-2794. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.033.
9
Polyclonal Secondary Mutations Drive Acquired Resistance to FGFR Inhibition in Patients with FGFR2 Fusion-Positive Cholangiocarcinoma.
Cancer Discov. 2017 Mar;7(3):252-263. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-1000. Epub 2016 Dec 29.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验