Helen Keller International, New York, New York, USA.
International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, USA.
Matern Child Nutr. 2018 Jul;14(3):e12573. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12573. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
Evidence is emerging from rigorous evaluations about the effectiveness of nutrition-sensitive agriculture programmes in improving nutritional outcomes. Additional evidence can elucidate how different programme components and pathways contribute and can be optimized for impact. The International Food Policy Research Institute, with Helen Keller International, designed a comprehensive framework to evaluate the delivery, utilization, and impact of Helen Keller International's enhanced homestead food production programme in Burkina Faso. After 18 months of implementation, a process evaluation was conducted to examine programme impact pathways, using key informant and semistructured interviews with implementing agents and beneficiaries, and with residents of control communities. Data were analyzed by International Food Policy Research Institute and reviewed with project managers and partners through multiple workshops to identify opportunities to strengthen implementation. Findings illuminated gaps between intended and actual delivery schemes, including input constraints, knowledge gaps among community agents in agriculture and young child nutrition practices, and lower than expected activity by community volunteers. In response, staff developed measures to overcome water constraints and expand vegetable and poultry production, retrained volunteers in certain techniques of food production and counselling for nutrition behaviour change, added small incentives to motivate volunteers, and shaped both immediate and long-term changes to the programme model. Working closely with International Food Policy Research Institute on the evaluation activities also expanded the repertoire of research methods and skills of Helen Keller International staff. Process evaluation can strengthen programme delivery, utilization, and design. Collaboration between researchers and implementers can improve programme effectiveness, project staff capacity, and advance delivery science.
越来越多的严谨评估结果表明,营养敏感型农业方案在改善营养状况方面卓有成效。更多的证据可以阐明不同方案组成部分和途径的作用,并优化其产生的影响。国际粮食政策研究所与海伦·凯勒国际组织合作,设计了一个全面的框架,用以评估海伦·凯勒国际组织在布基纳法索实施的强化家庭粮食生产方案的实施、利用和影响。在实施 18 个月后,进行了一项进程评估,以通过与实施机构和受益人的主要知情人和半结构化访谈,并与对照社区的居民进行访谈,研究方案的影响途径。国际粮食政策研究所对数据进行了分析,并通过多次研讨会与项目经理和合作伙伴一起审查了数据,以确定加强实施的机会。研究结果揭示了预期和实际交付方案之间的差距,包括投入方面的限制、社区农业和幼儿营养实践方面的代理人员的知识差距、以及社区志愿者的活动低于预期。对此,工作人员制定了克服水资源限制和扩大蔬菜和家禽生产的措施,重新培训志愿者掌握某些粮食生产和营养行为改变咨询技巧,增加小激励措施来调动志愿者的积极性,并对方案模式进行了短期和长期的调整。与国际粮食政策研究所密切合作开展评估活动,也扩大了海伦·凯勒国际组织工作人员的研究方法和技能组合。进程评估可以加强方案的交付、利用和设计。研究人员和实施人员之间的合作可以提高方案的有效性、项目工作人员的能力,并推动交付科学的发展。