• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家禽和鱼类消费与总癌症死亡率的关系:前瞻性研究的荟萃分析。

Poultry and Fish Consumption in Relation to Total Cancer Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

作者信息

Zhang Zheng, Chen Guo-Chong, Qin Zhi-Zhen, Tong Xing, Li Da-Peng, Qin Li-Qiang

机构信息

a Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene , School of Public Health, Soochow University , Suzhou , Jiangsu Province , China.

b School of Public Health, Hebei Medical University , Shijiazhuang , Hebei Province , China.

出版信息

Nutr Cancer. 2018 Feb-Mar;70(2):204-212. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1412474. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

DOI:10.1080/01635581.2018.1412474
PMID:29278940
Abstract

Observational studies on the association between fish and poultry intake and the risk of total cancer mortality have been reported with mixed results. Thus, we aimed to assess this association by conducting a meta-analysis of prospective studies. We performed a literature search on PubMed database through February 1, 2017 to identify relative prospective studies. A random-effects model was used to calculate the summary estimates. We identified fourteen prospective studies involving 2,378,204 participants and 96,712 cancer mortality events. Comparing the highest category of consumption with lowest category, pooled relative risk (RR) of total cancer mortality was 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.05) for fish (10 studies) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for poultry (8 studies), respectively. However, we failed to identify any dose-response association based on a limited number of eligible studies, with a pooled RR of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92-1.05) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.88-1.07) for each 100 g per day increment in fish and poultry consumption, respectively. In summary, this meta-analysis indicates that consumption of either fish or poultry is not substantially associated with lower risk of total cancer mortality. The observed weak inverse association for high poultry consumption needs to be verified in additional large prospective studies.

摘要

关于鱼类和家禽摄入量与总癌症死亡率风险之间关联的观察性研究报告结果不一。因此,我们旨在通过对前瞻性研究进行荟萃分析来评估这种关联。我们在PubMed数据库中进行了文献检索,截至2017年2月1日,以确定相关的前瞻性研究。采用随机效应模型计算汇总估计值。我们确定了14项前瞻性研究,涉及2378204名参与者和96712例癌症死亡事件。将最高消费类别与最低消费类别进行比较,鱼类(10项研究)的总癌症死亡率合并相对风险(RR)为0.99(95%置信区间[CI],0.94 - 1.05),家禽(8项研究)为0.96(95%CI,0.93 - 1.00)。然而,基于有限数量的合格研究,我们未能发现任何剂量反应关联,鱼类和家禽消费每天每增加100克,合并RR分别为0.98(95%CI,0.92 - 1.05)和0.97(95%CI,0.88 - 1.07)。总之,这项荟萃分析表明,食用鱼类或家禽与降低总癌症死亡率风险并无实质性关联。对于高家禽消费所观察到的微弱反向关联需要在更多大型前瞻性研究中加以验证。

相似文献

1
Poultry and Fish Consumption in Relation to Total Cancer Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.家禽和鱼类消费与总癌症死亡率的关系:前瞻性研究的荟萃分析。
Nutr Cancer. 2018 Feb-Mar;70(2):204-212. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1412474. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
2
Dietary poultry intake and the risk of stroke: A dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.膳食中家禽摄入量与中风风险:前瞻性队列研究的剂量反应荟萃分析。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018 Feb;23:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2017.11.001. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
3
Poultry and fish intake and risk of esophageal cancer: A meta-analysis of observational studies.家禽和鱼类摄入量与食管癌风险:观察性研究的荟萃分析
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;12(1):e82-91. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12114. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
4
Red and processed meat consumption and risk of stroke: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.食用红色和加工肉类与中风风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jan;67(1):91-5. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.180. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
5
Fish, long chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids consumption, and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis from 23 independent prospective cohort studies.鱼类、长链ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸的摄入与全因死亡率风险:来自23项独立前瞻性队列研究的系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017;26(5):939-956. doi: 10.6133/apjcn.072017.01.
6
Meta-analysis of fish consumption and risk of pancreatic cancer in 13 prospective studies with 1.8 million participants.吃鱼与胰腺癌风险的 13 项前瞻性研究的荟萃分析:纳入 180 万参与者。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0222139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222139. eCollection 2019.
7
Fish consumption and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.鱼类消费与全因死亡率:队列研究的荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;70(2):155-61. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.72. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Fish consumption and risk of depression: a meta-analysis.鱼类消费与抑郁症风险:一项荟萃分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Mar;70(3):299-304. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206278. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
9
Cereal fibre intake and risk of mortality from all causes, CVD, cancer and inflammatory diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.谷类纤维摄入量与全因、心血管疾病、癌症及炎症性疾病死亡率的关系:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Nutr. 2016 Jul;116(2):343-52. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516001938. Epub 2016 May 19.
10
Fish consumption and acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis.鱼类摄入与急性冠状动脉综合征:荟萃分析。
Am J Med. 2014 Sep;127(9):848-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Meat and meat products - a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023.肉类及肉制品——《2023年北欧营养建议》的范围界定综述
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Feb 21;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10538. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparing Lifestyle Modifications and the Magnitude of Their Associated Benefit on Cancer Mortality.比较生活方式改变及其对癌症死亡率相关获益的程度。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 23;15(9):2038. doi: 10.3390/nu15092038.
3
Fish consumption in multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational and clinical studies.
鱼类消费与多种健康结局:观察性和临床研究的荟萃分析的综合评价
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Feb 15;11(3):152. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6515.
4
Poultry Consumption and Human Health: How Much Is Really Known? A Systematically Searched Scoping Review and Research Perspective.家禽消费与人类健康:我们究竟了解多少?一项系统检索的范围综述和研究视角。
Adv Nutr. 2022 Dec 22;13(6):2115-2124. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac074.
5
Blood n-3 fatty acid levels and total and cause-specific mortality from 17 prospective studies.17 项前瞻性研究中血液 n-3 脂肪酸水平与全因及死因特异性死亡率的关系。
Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 22;12(1):2329. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22370-2.
6
Dietary Intake of Red Meat, Processed Meat, and Poultry and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and All-Cause Mortality in the Context of Dietary Guideline Compliance.在遵循膳食指南的前提下,红肉类、加工肉类和禽类的饮食摄入量与结直肠癌和全因死亡率的关系。
Nutrients. 2020 Dec 23;13(1):32. doi: 10.3390/nu13010032.
7
Intake of fish and long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and risk of diseases in a Japanese population: a narrative review.鱼类和长链 n-3 多不饱和脂肪酸的摄入与日本人患病风险:叙述性综述。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2021 Jun;75(6):902-920. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00751-y. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
Fish Consumption and the Risk of Chronic Disease: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies.鱼类摄入与慢性病风险:前瞻性队列研究荟萃分析的伞式评价。
Adv Nutr. 2020 Sep 1;11(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmaa029.
9
The Potential for Plant-Based Diets to Promote Health Among Blacks Living in the United States.植物性饮食在美国的黑人中促进健康的潜力。
Nutrients. 2019 Dec 2;11(12):2915. doi: 10.3390/nu11122915.