Meinilä Jelena, Virtanen Jyrki K
Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
School of Medicine, Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Food Nutr Res. 2024 Feb 21;68. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10538. eCollection 2024.
Meat is not only a source of several nutrients but also a proposed risk factor for several non-communicable diseases. Here, we describe the totality of evidence for the role of meat intake for chronic disease outcomes, discuss potential mechanistic pathways, knowledge gaps, and limitations of the literature. Use of the scoping review is based on a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis on the association between poultry intake and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), qualified SRs (as defined in the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 project) on meat intake and cancer by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and a systematic literature search of SRs and meta-analyses. The quality of the SRs was evaluated using a modified AMSTAR 2 tool, and the strength of evidence was evaluated based on a predefined criteria developed by the WCRF. The quality of the SRs was on average critically low. Our findings indicate that the evidence is too limited for conclusions for most of the chronic disease outcomes. However, findings from qualified SRs indicate strong evidence that processed meat increases the risk of colorectal cancer and probable evidence that red meat (unprocessed, processed, or both) increases the risk. The evidence suggests that both unprocessed red meat and processed meat (also including processed poultry meat) are probable risk factors for CVD mortality and stroke, and that total red meat and processed meat are risk factors for CHD. We found no sufficient evidence suggesting that unprocessed red meat, processed red meat, total red meat, or processed meat (including red and white meat) would be protective of any chronic disease. There was also no sufficient evidence to conclude on protective effect of poultry on any chronic diseases; effects on the risk of CVD, stroke, and T2D, to any direction, were regarded as unlikely.
肉类不仅是多种营养素的来源,也是多种非传染性疾病的潜在风险因素。在此,我们描述了肉类摄入对慢性病结局影响的全部证据,讨论了潜在的作用机制途径、知识空白以及文献的局限性。本范围综述基于一项关于家禽摄入与心血管疾病(CVD)和2型糖尿病(T2D)之间关联的系统评价(SR)和荟萃分析、世界癌症研究基金会(WCRF)、国际癌症研究机构(IARC)关于肉类摄入与癌症的合格SR(如2023年北欧营养建议项目中所定义),以及对SR和荟萃分析的系统文献检索。使用改良的AMSTAR 2工具评估SR的质量,并根据WCRF制定的预定义标准评估证据强度。SR的质量平均极低。我们的研究结果表明,对于大多数慢性病结局,证据过于有限,无法得出结论。然而,合格SR的研究结果表明,有强有力的证据表明加工肉类会增加患结直肠癌的风险,有可能的证据表明红肉(未加工、加工或两者皆有)会增加风险。证据表明,未加工红肉和加工肉类(也包括加工禽肉)可能是CVD死亡率和中风的风险因素,而总红肉和加工肉类是冠心病的风险因素。我们没有发现足够的证据表明未加工红肉、加工红肉、总红肉或加工肉类(包括红肉和白肉)对任何慢性病有保护作用。也没有足够的证据得出家禽对任何慢性病有保护作用的结论;对CVD、中风和T2D风险的任何方向的影响都被认为不太可能。